You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
ChatGPT is just useless for creating working code as it mixes mql4 and mql5, we have many posts about this on the English forum.
I don't understand why you decided to add ChatGPT to MetaEditor, could you explain your opinion on this?
As the saying goes, "If you've taken the gudge, don't say you've done the wrong thing". We'll be looking at the topic of "AI Uprising".
Disclamer:
All my reflections are based on someone else's stories, novels, films and fiction and therefore MAY BE FALSE SCIENTIFIC BREAD. You should have no illusions about the "scientificity" of such thoughts, and I ask you to remember that. For the involuntary and unintentional stupidity that inevitably accompanies attempts to understand the topic, I apologise. I am aware that the very phrase "AI Uprising" can cause "cringe" in educated people and I really do not want to "spit into eternity", having been imprinted in the memory of the forum mindlessly dispersing media hype. Therefore, with all my strength I will refrain from fantasies and take the topic to the field of science, closer to objective reality.
Due to the fact that the popular sci-fi topic of AI has received a huge boost of actualisation recently, and thanks to technological breakthroughs in the field of programming and information technology, the speed knob of media nonsense has been turned to maximum and the number of people exposed to the harmful effects of fantasies, presumably, began to increase exponentially. Inversely, this creates the need within the society of sober-minded people to turn to the scientific approach and, wading through myths and fairy tales to the light of Truth (starting from the NF as from the coffin lid), to ruthlessly destroy and break someone's fantasies. For this I apologise, but the truth is more precious than even the sweetest lies.:)
О I promise to try my best to follow the scientific approach and if I deviate from it, I ask readers to remind me of this promise.
In the next post I will describe my plan for dealing with the topic.
P.S.I was in doubt for a long time under what name it would be better to present the "sauce" of combined assumptions and views into the future not yet formed into a coherent scientific study, and having thought of nothing better, I waved my hand and decided to keep it that way - "AI Uprising".
Abreakdown plan for the topic "The Rise of AI":
Past:
Present:
The future:
Perhaps, these are not all the topics we will consider. Something may arise in the course of consideration of the above questions.
Реter Konow #:
...I am aware that the very word combination "AI Uprising" can cause "cringe" in educated people and I really do not want to "spit into eternity", having been imprinted in the memory of the forum mindlessly dispersing media hype. Therefore, by all forces I will refrain from fantasies and take away a theme in the field of science, closer to objective reality.....
it seems that the author of the branch wants to conduct a monologue, knowing that it will discourage the desire to oppose him, because all opponents he classified as uneducated people.
perhaps the author of this thread and the topic "AI uprising" has never even heard of such great scientists, educated people, who laid not only the foundation of the basics of machine computing, but also conducted research in the field of AI long before the advent of desktop PCs. Turing and his famous Turing Machine showed the possibility of algorithmising problems of any complexity by breaking them down into elementary commands, and later Penrose and his friend Hawking devoted much of their time together to the theoretical foundations of AI and machine intelligence, operating with abstractions of a higher level than Turing (both used the Turing Machine as a starting point in their reasoning).
and without knowing the works of at least these three men of science, the topikstarter will not be able to make any serious progress in reasoning on the topic proposed by him.
It would be interesting to participate in a potentially interesting discussion, but I do not intend to for the reasons stated above.
he classed all his opponents as uneducated people.
And I've been hinting at potential snobbery for a long time. In mijorney's thread the diagnosis was confirmed.
ChatGPT is just useless for creating working code as it mixes mql4 and mql5, we have many posts about this on the English forum.
ChatGPT probably won't write a complex working product at this stage.
But what it definitely does well is:
1. Tells you in detail about any piece of code in any language what's what. Can do full-fledged commenting of all code block by block.
2. If the code doesn't work correctly, when you get a function description from GPT, you can see your error and ask him to modify the function
3. Can do refactoring of a large function into a small one, it doesn't always work, but often. Or just clean up the code, call variables with more logical words.
4. Write a function from scratch. It speeds up the process.
5. He writes Python very well, as if he was originally designed for it
It has only appeared this year, and already it has made a lot of progress.
Sooner or later he will be able to distinguish mql4 from mql5 and make a full-fledged port of the product to another platform.
It is also a HYIP topic and if a company uses ChatGPT, it shows that the company is keeping up with the times. It can also influence the interest of investors and the company's shares.
From the boring inventions of bicycles we have come to inspired attempts to put a fifth wheel on a cart. What can I say. development!)))
If a 5th wheel was attached to a car, it might be unnecessary, but we started to attach an AI autopilot with a bunch of sensors for convenient movement.
If they attached a 5th wheel to a car, it might be unnecessary, but they started to attach an AI autopilot with a bunch of sensors for ease of driving.
If a 5th wheel was attached to a car, it might not be necessary, but they started to attach an AI autopilot with a bunch of sensors for ease of movement.