A topic for traders. - page 241
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Since you're a long degenerate type, you have no shame, that's true.
In private, by the way, I wished you a happy new year and wished you improvement, and you squealed like a pig, that is as usual. 🤣😂
I think everyone is already wondering, what was the drama there?
So as not to clutter up the thread, wrote him in person.
Here's actually all the friendly correspondence without any cuts.
And now he is talking in public.)))
++++++++++
I didn't read your opuses that blur the meaning. Only a couple of lines of thought is understandable for most people and me in particular.
I don't want to bring this topic of conversation to the public.
In some cases you look like a sneak.)) Not as an intelligent and judicious person. You are not a leader. You're a mouthpiece for the bad state of the morbid peeple)))
Look at you from the outside.
Running? That's too much.))
Seen YOU looking for ways to provoke me into a discourse. Empty in general or to provoke. Either way I'm a sore itch for you.))))))))
Dismissed)))
Well here's the shameful Izversky himself admitting to breaking into my personal account and bellowing 🤣😆😊 unlearned...
By doing so only confirmed his shittiness.
And now the numpty numpty is trying to prove something to me from a new account by draining the previous ones.
Particularly amusing that the nerd doesn't even know the meaning of the word "enviable" - speaking of the quality of education...
In general, the worst will always envy the best... the proletarians will always envy the capitalists... the nerds will always squeal with ill-concealed anger and envy of the intellectual elite...
As predicted - Izersky won't be able to get rid of his own sense of inferiority - and will continue his hysterics and ridiculous ridiculous attempts to prove his supposedly-successfulness...
So far he has only succeeded in ways to drain money in waves 🌊😁.
...
For your boorish behaviour, I'll poke your nose in it every day.)
You can't prove anything with your tongue, but I'll prove it with mine. Hee-hee.)
Let's see who's worth what.)
For your boorish behaviour, I will rub your nose in it every day).
You can't prove anything with your tongue, but I'll prove it with mine. Hee-hee.)
We'll see who's worth something.)
But it's your boorish behavior, and you've been squealing and clinging to my even neutral posts from the very beginning, Izersky, like a low-grade tramp, uncultured and uneducated, offended, but also stupid.
Stupid - because you're going to spill your guts again for the amusement of everyone here... trading without a system is stupid and addictive...
But I don't care, you can act all you want...
I'm just having fun, poking you with a stick, and feeding off your misery like a wompire. 🧛♂️
You can't get rid of the feeling of beinga loser, aninferiorprofane, an expendable for the market - and you'll forever be chasing me around trying to prove something. 😉
No doubt you'll bashfully delete the signal again, it's only a matter of time. ⏳
I'd have you both removed forever.
Start with yourself! 😆 You're no use anyway.
I guess I've been chatting to guests and walking the dog for a long time.)
But better late than never).
Anyway, what our cholivar with Drimmer has shown is that it is possible to find some agreement on the issues under discussion, which is good))).
What I would like for the traders branch. Purely my opinion)
I would not like to see a competition between McD and Ma and the Analyst Mentor in statements, but a comparison of the performance of their trading ideas in real life and analysis, and perhaps an analysis of the history, if there is any material. Like in 14, everything was working, and then it stopped, and then some conclusions.
Please do not take my theses seriously.)
I have to go to work tomorrow for some))))
Oh hey, what's your interest? 😉
Of course beggars can also turn out talented, provided they get into a supportive environment.
Now, if you follow the thought carefully, it's clear that poor dysfunctional parents can hardly ensure entry into such an environment, and more likely that their children will also be just as useless, it's noticed that rabble and the poor breed more intensely than noble gentlemen, this can also be seen in birth rates and population densities in dysfunctional countries.
That's really the only question.
Am I correct in your thinking that the beggars are the layer of society that should not exist, but they are more fecund? And the noble ones are less likely to reproduce because they have a decent education, access to good health care and a decent income for their lives?
It turns out that in order to reduce the spread of beggars it is necessary to provide them with a good education, access to medicine and the income necessary for that standard of living. This would not only have a positive impact on the development of society, but also on ecology, because there would be no need to produce lower quality and cheaper goods, which would also push production towards development...
Am I correct in your thinking that beggars are the layer of society that should not exist, but they are more likely to breed? And the noble breed less because they have a decent education, access to good medicine and a decent income for this life?
It turns out that in order to reduce the rate of proliferation of beggars it is necessary to provide them with a good education, access to medicine and the income necessary for that standard of living. This would not only have a positive impact on the development of society, but also on ecology, because there would be no need to produce lower-quality and cheaper goods, which would push the industry forward...
What we want is a bright good world without a lot of evil uneducated people...
More people does not mean better.