![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Fore is better.
it should work just for starters.
I agree with the fact that the exchange may not have plugins, I don't know.
If there aren't any, it's just that, nothing more.
Well here it is certainly debatable. But last year I earned on MSFT and at the end of the year I understood that I should have made only 3 transactions and the income would have been bigger.
In forex more in 90% is about leverage and at the moments of earnings everyone is very quiet that ask.... them at the same rate because of the same leverage.
10% is a low commission compared to stocks.
The essence as correctly written above - the same bars, but the bars are predictable and less predictable - it is better to choose predictable )))
As an example, the RSI indicator is useless in my opinion, I was shocked when I saw that V (visa) trades by it like a textbook (I saw such a picture a few years ago).
As if it is better to make stable earnings in stocks, and to play part of the income in forex )))
Well, that's debatable of course. I was earning all last year on MSFT and at the end of the year I realized that I should have made only 3 trades and the income would have been higher.
In forex it is more in 90% leverage and at the moments of earning everyone is very silent about what to ask.... them at the same rate because of the same leverage.
10% is a low commission compared to stocks.
The essence as correctly written above - the same bars, but the bars are predictable and less predictable - it is better to choose predictable )))
As an example, the RSI indicator is useless in my opinion, I was shocked when I saw that V (visa) trades by it like a textbook (I saw such a picture a few years ago).
As if it is better to earn steadily on stocks, and to play part of income on forex ))))
I have a different approach - to earn on FORTS, and to conserve profits in divident shares.
I have a different approach - make money on FORTS and save the profits in dividend stocks.
Very sensible.
I have three projects myself: Long-Term, Mid-Term and Intraday.
I have a good long term strategy.
As probably unnecessary advice - try crypto futures - the returns can be orders of magnitude greater )))))))))
use stop-loss as part of the algorithm ? close with a trailing stop ?
wait for the guests.
I'd like to see some justification on this topic.
Very sensible.
I have three projects myself: Long Term, Medium Term and Intraday.
So far, the Long Term wins.
Probably needless advice - try crypto futures, the payoff may be orders of magnitude higher )))))))))
As long as the range is working properly, my lava is flying up, I want to write on MT5:
30 limits each top and bottom - grid spacing is about average range on M 15 in 6 hours:
29%:
While the range is working properly, the lava is flying up, I want to write on MT5:
30 limits on top and bottom - grid spacing is about average range on M 15 in 6 hours:
29%:
I have a preparation so far ))))))
I'm still preparing ))))))
A profitable strategy that makes 18,000 trades in a month in the tester can suddenly turn into a loser in the real world.
A profitable strategy that makes 18,000 trades per month in the tester can suddenly turn into a loser in the real world.
A profitable strategy that makes 18,000 trades a month in the tester can suddenly turn into a loser in the real world.
In 95% of cases this is the case, unfortunately. In 4 years I have tried everything. I came to the conclusion - the easier, the better result = MACD rules)))
Concluded - the simpler, the better the result