The future of the Forex industry - page 109

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

Boyan. If the actions of the Americans are recognised as genocide, then so many actions of so many other countries must also be recognised as genocide. Therefore they will never be recognised as genocide. All are good in their own way. The costs of colonisation. I didn't make that up.

Why can't the Amer's actions against the Indians be recognised as genocide, but the Serbs' actions against the Kosovo Albanians can?

 
Aleksey Nikolayev:

It turns out,Capitalism = Bright Future - Transhumanism)

Indeed, according to the laws of algebra it does. You make a good point.)))

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

Boyan. If the actions of Americans are recognised as genocide, then so many actions of so many other countries must also be recognised as genocide. The costs of colonisation. This was not my idea.

The Romans should be urgently sued for the destruction of Carthage!

After that, the Vatican should be sued at once for the Crusades, and the Saracens for the Jihad.

Do not forget to find and dig up the bones of Moses and scold him for the extermination of the Midianites (Numbers 31:15-18).

 
khorosh:

Why can't the Amer's actions against the Indians be recognized as genocide, but the Serbs' actions against the Kosovo Albanians can?

Seven thousand in one night, and not as a result of hostilities, but simply taken out and shot.

And the Indians over a long period as a result of non-targeted clashes and diseases from new diseases. But I'm not the one making these judgements in the first place.

 
transcendreamer:

Speaking of Indians, especially Central Americans,

of course the conquistadors optimised them, there's no denying that,

but somehow they forget that the Indians themselves also slaughtered each other and made hellish sacrifices with great enthusiasm,

It was a funny time, yeah 😊

Logic is "iron" If Indians were killing each other, you can't do without helping them do it)))

 
khorosh:

Indeed, according to the laws of algebra it is. That's a good point.)))

I just remembered the same formula about socialism, communism and electrification)

 
khorosh:

Why contrast the development of technology with the stability of the state. Without stability in the state, nothing can develop. Imagine a country riven by strife and civil war. Can anything develop there? You are not by any chance a kook, are you?

Mr. Khorosh, the stool is already smoking under you!

Be calmer please. 😁


Now would you not understand what I meant and twist in the most embarrassing way.

If you sit around just praying for stability, and there is nothing but stability, you will end up in a swamp.

And it's been that way for a long time...

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

Seven thousand in one night, and not as a result of fighting, but simply taken out and shot.

And the Indians over a long period as a result of non-targeted confrontations and diseases from new diseases.

This sounds like Gorbatov's line from the movie 'Meeting Place...'. Don't be afraid we will kill you without hurting you. I would also add "and gradually.")

 
khorosh:

The logic is "ironclad" If the Indians were killing each other, then there is no way around not helping them do it.)))

Clearly evolutionarily the Indians had to concede, they were only inefficiently occupying that land. 😎

Understandable that it sounds a bit cynical, but really, imagine, you arrive so colonise Mars, and taam....

Turns out to be an intelligent race of savage cannibals, it's just that until now they've been hiding in caves under the surface of Mars.

So, let's say...

So what are we supposed to do now, shut down all colonisation or something?

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

Yes. It was so bad there that it is not clear whether they exterminated or saved it somehow.

In fact, the conquistadors greatly accelerated the processes, so it became known as a demographic catastrophe, especially in South America, they say up to 50% or even more of the local population...

But the process could have been stretched for centuries and there would have been no difference anyway.