Charles Dow's theory - page 72
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No. If the indicator redraws depending on the sample, then it is impossible to say unambiguously.
There is a way out - we will take only necessary 4 just finished bars of history, as in the case of OHLC
The past cannot be changed, the future depends on the present.
Thank you, I agree. And the future isn't known either. Isn't it?
And the present is the sample size... hence we need to get the n - sample size right, for a better prediction of the future.
Absolutely agree, even tougher - we will only take 4 fresh bars
Everyone already knows there's an N.P.B.
You open a buy order, you close with a loss, you look at the PNB and it says Sell had to be.... OK now... I open a sell order, I'm in the red again,
and the NSP says Buy Was
Thank you, I agree. And the future isn't known either. Isn't it?
Again, it is known if you choose the present correctly, as Eugene says.
Opened a buy order, closed with a minus, look at the PNB and it says Sell had to be.... OK now...open a sell order, again in minus,
and the NSP says Buy Was
Correct, let's look at the 4 nearest bars. Which instrument needs an urgent forecast?
Again, it is known if you choose the present correctly, as Eugene says.
Is the future known unambiguously precisely or as a certain probability (it may or may not happen)?
Opened a buy order, closed with a minus, look at the PNB and it says Sell had to be.... OK now...open a sell order, again in minus,
and the NSP says BUY WAS
the future definitely depends on the past and present but there is a link at the end which is beyond humanity's reach, Yusuf has 3 total sentences and between the second and third number of Pi are more fractions, a stupid idea this PNB
Again, known if you choose the present correctly, as Eugene says.
The problem may be that the 'right' will be ex post facto, and not known in advance.
Is the future known with certainty or as a certain probability (it may or may not happen)?
Probability is a pseudoscience