Quantum analysis Duca - page 77
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Maxim, with all due respect, but you simply haven't understood all the implications of quantization and the properties of Duke space. But it doesn't matter, everyone has their own way.
I just posted screenshots in another thread yesterday. That's the space of the dukkah. And now it's time to think about the physical meaning... And I'll repeat the question: which chart is easy to make money on, and which is very difficult?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/325797/page2#comment_13790880
Of course, a quant chart has the property of fractality, and you can draw many variants. The main criterion is the size of your deposit. On $100 you will draw one channel, while on a million you will draw a completely different one.
No, I will always build a channel of the minimum profitable size in order to maximise profit and it will not depend much on the deposit. The width of the channel will depend on many factors, but the size of the deposit is the last and most indirect factor that does not directly affect the width of the channel.
Freedom of speech has not been abolished).
But you need treatment too, at least preventive care once in a while.
No, I will always build a channel of the minimum profitable size in order to maximise profit and it will not depend much on the deposit. The width of the channel will depend on many factors, but the size of the deposit is the last and most indirect factor that does not directly affect the width of the channel.
I did read 76 pages though. I thought it would be useful. There may be some useful information for someone, but I have already gone through it all. The whole theory is underdeveloped which is why I discarded it after reading it a few years ago. There are some sensible points there that I used to even use, but as I developed it became clear that it wasn't enough, everything needs to be refined and reworked. It's a very superficial story.
It was just a simple example of how any dynamic process can be broken down into its components (this example has been gathering dust on the shelf for more than five years).
These components need not be symmetrical, they can easily be set asymmetry.
The components need not be two; there can be any predetermined number of components.
Any constituent, depending on current conditions, can be decomposed into its constituents, so to speak, of the second order.
Any constituents, depending on the current conditions, can be folded into one subprocess.
etc.
It just takes the will ;)
is it? So I'm missing something...
Taking your picture from page 4 and observing parabolic channels.
https://c.mql5.com/3/297/image__14.png
I assume that if the quantum were to increase smoothly, they would smoothly transform into linear. Not sure about that though. Need to experiment.
It's out of magic class here. Even I don't get it)) Tempting.
This was just an example of how any dynamic process can be decomposed into its components (this example has been gathering dust on the shelf for more than five years).
These components need not be symmetric, they can easily be set asymmetry.
The components need not be two; there can be any predetermined number of components.
Any constituent, depending on the current conditions, can be decomposed into its components.
Any constituent, depending on current conditions, can be rolled up into one subprocess.
etc.
It just takes the will ;)
Here, for once, I agree with you.
Each category (value) of money occupies its own niche.
Spongebob finally got banned?))
What was he banned for? He seemed to be communicating normally, I wonder).