Quantum analysis Duca - page 73
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Good illustration from ter.ver, but again, what has Duca got to do with it?
The picture shows the SB, a typical sampling trajectory, expectation and variance lines.Everyone here knows the equations of these lines from the early days of forex.
We take 100500 wanderings, select 10% with the best result and get these trajectories and lines.
It's called sectarians discovered confidence intervals )))))))
As many questions as I ask, not a single answer on the subject.
In fact, reprinting material from one source here, without explaining formulas, etc.
As many questions as I ask, not a single answer on the subject.
In fact, reprinting material from one source here, without explaining formulas, etc.
And there will be no answers, this is a religion, here it is customary to believe, but to ask )))))
I have some bad news for you...
the spillover theory doesn't work
it's better to go to the factory.
More accurately of course capital spillovers exist objectively, but it has a non-linear effect as the rate shift is not from the absolute volume of bids, but from the differential of their volumes in a particular interval, and you still won't get an adequate view of all volumes unless you work in BOA/CB/MS/JPM/DB/... and even if you were working there, you won't be able to see future volumes if someone should want to trade... so it's all futile... all is futile...
I don't need flow volumes. There's the fact of spillover and the storage volumes. That's not the point, of course.
.
Just seeing that the quantization of a single currency pair is vapid. It is.
Quantisation of groups, on the other hand, would be of interest. If there are such connoisseurs.
And I don't need overflow volumes. There is the fact of overflow and the storage volumes. That's out of the question.
.
It's just that you can see that the quantisation of a single currency pair is vapid. It is.
Quantisation of groups, on the other hand, would be of interest. If there are such connoisseurs.
Are there any potato quanta?
Yes, but they are called chips for some reason).
Yes, but they are called chips for some reason).
Where are the moderators?
Why are some people here trying to incite national hatred? Once again.
At least warn the kid. Probably doesn't understand.
Duk has no quantum mechanics.
It's clear to any educated person
there is only a barbaric attempt to imitate quantum mechanics designed for villagers or simply poorly educated citizens
God, it's so messed up...
Throwing in scrappy knowledge dissolves into the thick of emotional posts. Okay, there would be 5-6 pages, but the topic sprawls into a multi-volume book, you can't look through it to find what you've missed.