The most banal trading strategy - page 26

 
multiplicator:

Imagine that you are being broadcasted a random rambling chart into your terminal.
and you're doing your normal trading. "overcompensating for losses and undercompensating for profits".

Now imagine that you've flipped. and now you're outliving the profits and underperforming the losses.
Would you start making money? No! Because you can't make money from accidental wandering!))

And if you don't know the difference between forex and gsb, then you will trade the same way you did on gsb.

So, by just flipping the hold trade method, there is no profit to be made.

Then you need to get away from the platitudes.

 
Andrey Gladyshev:

Then you have to get away from the platitudes.

How do you trade?

You see a trend on the chart and open for its continuation. If the graph has gone in your direction, watch it, and at the slightest reversal, you get scared and close the deal.
If the chart moved against you - you wait until it comes back to close the trade at zero.
?

In this case, you will end up with a lot of profitable deals.

a few null trades (when the chart returned to zero)

and a few losing trades, large in size. (when you could not take losses anymore and closed the trade)

Let's discard the zeros. This leaves us with a lot of small profitable deals and several losing large deals. Which compensate each other.


If you roll over, it will be: a lot of losing small trades and a few profitable large ones. (will add up to zero).
 
multiplicator:
How do you trade?

You see a trend on the chart and open for its continuation. If the graph has gone in your direction, watch it, and at the slightest reversal, you get scared and close the deal.
And if the chart went against you - you wait until it comes back to close it at zero.
?

In this case, you will end up with a lot of profitable deals.

a few null trades (when the chart returned to zero)

and a few losing trades, large in size. (when you could not take losses anymore and closed the trade)

Let's discard the zeros. That leaves us with a lot of small profitable deals and several losing large deals. Which compensate each other.


If you roll over, it will be: a lot of losing small trades and a few profitable large ones. (will add up to zero).

The point of what you are saying makes sense to me. Maybe we're digging in the wrong place.

 
Andrey Gladyshev:

Then you need to get away from the platitudes.

Read the descriptions of all the indicators on the mql5 website and try to understand what principle they all profess.

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/trend_indicators

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/oscillators

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/volume_indicators

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/bw_indicators

 
multiplicator:

Read the descriptions of all the indicators on the mql5 website and try to understand what principle they all profess.

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/trend_indicators

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/oscillators

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/volume_indicators

https://www.metatrader5.com/ru/terminal/help/indicators/bw_indicators

And which one? Sorry to intrude.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Which one is it? Sorry to interrupt.

it's his assignment)
 
multiplicator:

you can't make money on casual wandering!))

This is not true.

 
mikhael1983isakov:

It does not correspond to reality.

But it is consistent with the facts.

 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

But it fits the facts.

And they don't.) Another issue is that playing SB, winning as well as losing, are random events.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

And they are not). Another issue is that playing SB, winning as well as losing, are random events.

Firstly, since this discussion has arisen, I would like to point out that even random processes can be predicted. And secondly, it is naturally a fact that the flow of quotes is not a random process.