You have a technical mind, don't you? - page 22
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Let's say they do, but how do you do it properly, can you tell a two-timer?
1. We are on a ship (rectangle) that is moving at half the speed of light in the direction of the arrow (to the right).
2. At the point B there is an observer.
3. From point A we send two light beams in opposite directions.
4. How will the time change on the ship relative to the observer?
For the observer the speed of the two beams (L1 and L2) is the same, for us in the ship the same. L2 we are catching up, so time must slow down by a factor of two = 1/c-0.5c. At the same time, from L1 we are running away, so time must accelerate by a factor of 1.5 = c+0.5c. That's nonsense, isn't it?
There are a large number of seeming paradoxes associated with the theory of relativity. Many of them have been dealt with repeatedly.
...
That's how we live... Why are you so obsessed with matter and space? Will it help you make money on the forex market? Oh, yeah, sure, "not by bread alone..." You can't explain your motivation in any other way...
Nothing wrong with that. Inquisitive people wanted to express their vision of the world, sometimes inconsistent with modern science. Science was built on a primitive foundation and today it is an inverted pyramid, the stability of which is questionable.
Participants in this thread are likely to be inquisitive and to unravel the mystery of the forex market. Let's wish them success.
There are a large number of apparent paradoxes associated with the theory of relativity. Many of them have been dealt with many times.
I have no doubt, at least we can always come up with a special theory for the case of two torches on the same ship ))
The clarity of your explanation is like the clarity of Hegel's proof that the number of planets in the solar system is seven. That is, it is the typical clarity of nonsensical sophistic reasoning that has no relation to the real state of affairs. This is just another gap in your understanding of logic - seemingly obvious does not mean true and modern science gives many examples of this.
One can sense the grip of a strong personality who is always right about everything.
You can feel the grip of a strong personality who is always right about everything.
This is someone who is simply literate and really knows how to think.
Everyone has a chance to be wrong. But to give a judgement of last resort is too much.
You can feel the grip of a strong personality who is always right about everything.
He's pouring water. Aquarius, I guess.
Sophistry, scholasticism, whatever... oh, yeah, Hegel, scientists, books. Just like the demagogue Nevzorov.
I must also smoke a pipe, so that just vasha, personality! D)))
This is a person who is simply literate and actually knows how to think.
No one here knows how to think. Four or five people at the most. The rest are fantasists.
A person who violates the first law of logic (space=matter) cannot a priori be literate1) Is it possible for a material body to exist outside of space and outside of time?
2) Can motion of a material body occur outside of space and outside of time?
What are your answers to these questions?1) no
2) no
There is nothing wrong with that. Inquisitive people wanted to express their vision of the world, sometimes inconsistent with modern science. Science was built on a primitive foundation and today it is an inverted pyramid, the stability of which is questionable.
Participants in this thread are likely to be inquisitive and to unravel the mystery of the forex market. We wish them success.
There is no Forex market mystery! There is a lack of training, persistence, ingenuity and industriousness of its "homegrown" clients! (including those with academic degrees and titles)