You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If they do not report to the government, then to whom?
So why follow any IMF "recommendations" if the RF is not borrowing from the IMF?
Recommendations are enforced, they are above the Central Bank. Sometimes it is possible to get away with something. Note that the interest rate is very high in order to use roubles for the development of the country. And there won't be enough roubles, you can't print as much as the economy needs.
Oil has fallen, budget revenues have fallen, but the obligations remain. In order to fulfil these ruble-denominated social obligations, it is necessary to drop the exchange rate of the national currency. They did. Everything is in order here.
The idea is correct, the execution and the work of the Central Bank are correct, but it was smooth on paper, but ravines intervened, "something" in whose interests is the Central Bank?
And if it is written in the Russian Constitution that the Central Bank was created to stabilize the national currency, but in fact, by letting the rouble float freely, it "ditched" foreign currency borrowers. And everything got away with it. No one has been able to sue. The Central Bank is not liable to the Russian Federation for its actions.
It cannot be held liable for failing to do so. The Central Bank as a financial body operates autonomously from the RF, but is formally considered its property, not being so in the totality of the facts.
At the very least, there should be legal liability for failure to comply with the RF Constitution. But even that we do not see. Which means that the Central Bank of Russia is an independent branch of economic power, completely autonomous in any of its actions.
strange, don't you think? It feels like the Central Bank of Russia is acting in the interests of the US Federal Reserve. :)
How exactly are they "forced"?
It's their bosses. It's said and done.
In a country where one person is responsible for both the ruble exchange rate and the toilet in Anadyr, it is normal.
Oil has fallen, budget revenues have fallen, but the obligations remain. In order to fulfil these rouble-denominated social obligations, it is necessary to drop the exchange rate of the national currency. They did. Everything is in order here.
The idea is correct, the execution and the work of the Central Bank are correct, but it was smooth on paper, but ravines intervened, "something" in whose interests is the Central Bank?
And if it is written in the Russian Constitution that the Central Bank was created to stabilize the national currency, but in fact, by letting the rouble float freely, it "ditched" foreign currency borrowers. And everything got away with it. No one has been able to sue. The Central Bank is not liable to the Russian Federation for its actions.
It cannot be held liable for failing to do so. The Central Bank as a financial body operates autonomously from the RF, but is formally considered to be its property, without being so in the totality of the facts.
At the very least, there should be legal liability for failure to comply with the RF Constitution. But even that we do not see. Which means that the Central Bank of Russia is an independent branch of economic power, completely autonomous in any of its actions.
strange, don't you think? It feels like the Central Bank of Russia is acting in the interests of the US Federal Reserve. :)