![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I have an epiphany...
о)
H.G. Wells is choking!
;)
Are you saying that there will be no long-term trends at all and there will be a lot of noise where only the rapid-fire automatons survive?
When I listen to jazz, my mother asks me to turn it down, it's "all noise" to her. ;)
--
And long-term trends are bound to happen. They happen regularly on a random series, too. You can even draw nice zigzags. On the history.
I have a P.S. there.
Your reluctance only shows that you haven't tried to write anything serious on the quad (or that you don't need to). Stay on it then, of course.
When I listen to jazz, my mum asks me to turn it down, it's "all noise" to her. ;)
--
And long-term trends are bound to happen. They happen regularly on a random series, too. You can even draw nice zigzags. On history.
I admit that it doesn't have to be very complicated. And in general, let's leave paukas out of it.
From purely ideological point of view, my system is very simple. Its implementation is just relatively complicated, mainly because of all sorts of embellishments. But I know: there is no limit to perfection!
If there are going to be long-term trends, why do you think that only high-frequency workers will survive?
Having long trends does not guarantee earnings.
If there are going to be long trends, why do you think that only high-frequency traders will survive? It's not like they are required to trade long trends.
You write as if you know in advance which trends are long and which are in the process of reversal.
If you know it, take care. Now bad people are after them. ;) Good luck to you!
--
I did not write that high-frequency machines will survive, I wrote that rapid-fire and smart machines will survive. By rapid-fire I meant "making a huge amount of analytical calculations per unit time", not a short ping. On a short ping, swarms of piranhas are already eating each other. :)
It was not a question of guarantees, but whether high-speed, high-frequency machine guns could be dispensed with.
I didn't write that high-frequency machines would survive, I wrote that fast-firing and smart machines would survive. By rapid-fire, I meant "making a huge amount of analytical calculations per unit time", not a short ping. On a short ping, swarms of piranhas are already eating each other. :)