MT4 doesn't have long to live - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Look at how the tester runs through the open bars. I.e. candlestick tails are not taken into account at all! And they are the ones that are licking the stops on the real, and the shorter the latter, the truer it is.
Sure, they will do it if their tails are bigger than stops and toes are bigger than tails.
I'd be surprised if they don't hit lots at that rate.
It's not like stealing pips inside a bar.
Of course, tails are larger than stops, and toes are larger than tails.
I'd be surprised if they didn't knock down the suckers at that rate.
This is not like stealing pips inside a bar.
Well, well, what do you think the stops and take's should be?)
Then Mr. Buffett should be your apprentice. He respects them. The main thing is to buy and you don't have to sell. "Buy and hold" in a word.)
What's good about the open-price test, can you say?)
Tyam need to work out what can be tested at opening prices and what cannot.
Well, well, what do you think the stops and take's should be?) Commensurate with days and weeks or something.)
Then Mr. Buffett should be your apprentice. He respects them. The main thing is to buy and you don't have to sell. "Buy and hold" in a word)
It's been explained to you that you shouldn't hammer nails with a TV, if you have a hammer. Piping with small stops inside the bar on all ticks. Who forbids you?
It's like they say in the classics:
Don't blame the mirror when you're wrong (from Kozma Prutkov, Aphorisms).
Tiam needs to think about what can be tested by opening prices and what cannot.
If you are, you would have realised long ago that a tester using any method (other than tick history) cannot give an adequate picture of the behaviour of the TS.
And you need it only to fine-tune the logic.
If you are, you would have realised long ago that a tester by any method cannot give an adequate picture of the TC's behaviour.
It is only needed to debug the logic.
Stop talking nonsense!
If you are, you would have realised a long time ago that a tester by any method cannot give an adequate picture of the behaviour of the TS.
It is only needed to debug the logic.
Well, what kind of logic do the villagers have when they complain that the candlestick shadows lick stops smaller than the average candlestick range?
Only the face is crooked. After all, even blondes would have more logic.
So what's the logic of the villagers when they complain about candlestick shadows licking off stops smaller than the average candlestick range?
Only the face is crooked. After all, even blondes would have more logic.
I gave just one example. And you, apart from sparkling, have not given a single example of what can be correctly tested on open. Especially not on the open watch.
Well, if you can't guess three times that when trading at opening prices stops should be set at a distance greater than the average range, what other examples can we discuss with you? In this case it is a matter of a knife on the head.
It is easier to discuss logic with a blonde. At least, with it you can move from an exact science subject to more humanitarian subjects, for example, on the continuation of species, benefits of demographic growth, etc., etc. with obligatory practical examples on the topic touched upon by thighs.
Well, if you can't guess three times that when trading at opening prices stops should be set at a distance greater than the average range, what other examples can we discuss with you? (As they say, you can put a bead of salt on your head.
It's easier to communicate with a blonde in terms of logic. At least, with her you can move from the subject of exact sciences to more humanitarian topics, for example, on the subject of reproduction, benefits of demographic growth, etc., etc. with obligatory practical examples on the topic touched by the thighs.
)) All about blondes, humanitarian issues, demographic growth, and not a single word on the subject.)
Don't get so upset. Well, you do not have such a thing yet, they have not invented it, and say so. And when it appears (with a stop that exceeds the "statistical average range"), then rejoice and shoot sparks).
In the meantime, there is absolutely nothing to rejoice about.