What is the average length of time it takes to understand the processes and identify some of the hidden patterns in forex? - page 20
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Exactly! I personally liked the sorento - it was simple and uncomplicated.
Going back to the brand.
Before it is "looked for-watch", at least two parameters should be set:
- time horizon; (sometimes coincides with the period of the beloved Mashka, but so does Timeframe...)
- confidence angle - minimum angle for correct approximation, when the trend is supposedly there and not flat at all...
;)You can forget about the timing altogether. The trends will remain.
as broken in the flats?
;)
A trend is ...
Will continue the trend - it means ...
Changes the trend to the opposite - it means ...
I am an advocate of having definitions. No definitions is not a scientific approach. Tambourine.
so don't babble...
our scientific one.
;)
LeoV:
How can you even communicate with you if you are always bluffing, you still haven't answered my question about the aiqyu problem and the fuzzy logic behind it.
If you just said that to show off, you should have said so, I don't know.
I'll read it in the morning. It's a lot, I can't make sense of it today.
Mother of God, two boys already ))))
There's something suspicious about you, sir. Don't keep me in suspense.
How can you even communicate with you if you keep bluffing, you still haven't answered my question about the aiqyu problem and the fuzzy logic in relation to it.
If you just said that to show off, that's what you should say.
Come on, people. Your solution doesn't stand up to any criticism, because it's an adjustment. The comparison to forex is apt, because it's similar.
There really is a 3-level problem here :))
1. solved it by myself.
2. I guessed it from the answer.
3. did not guess it after the answer was explained.
And the best part is, he's not cheating.)
Come on, people. Your solution does not stand up to any criticism, for it is a fit. The comparison with forex is on point, for it is similar.
There really is a 3-tier problem here :))
1. solved it by myself.
2. I guessed it from the answer.
3. did not figure it out after the answer was explained.
And the coolest thing is that he did not cheat :) ))
Come on, people. Your solution does not stand up to any criticism, for it is a fit. The comparison with forex is apt, for it is similar.
There really is a 3-tier problem here :))
1. solved it by myself.
2. I guessed it from the answer.
3. did not get it after the explanation of the answer.
And the best part -- he's not cheating.))
1- decided what? and which solution is correct, and why? if I initially say that let's say I came up with this problem myself and took another fuzzy logic as the basis (and its algorithms may be different).
then whose answer is correct?