Friday nonsense - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
OK, let's call this tool the emptiness index. Buddhists will pull up, and there are a lot of them.
How about making a virtual exchange where the "quotient" is a cumulation of true random numbers (source, e.g. cosmic rays). There are no spreads (everything is random as it is...). Will the exchange holder make money or not? What is interesting...
The casino owner will earn as well, if it has a statistical advantage, for example, due to commission or spread. The others will have a random equity with negative mo (at the expense of the same commission). Because any strategy on a martingale will also result in a martingale. Mathematically proven - Dub's stoppage theorem
How about making a virtual exchange where the "quotient" is a cumulation of true random numbers (source, e.g. cosmic rays). There are no spreads (everything is random as it is...). Will the exchange holder make money or not? Here's what's interesting...
paukas: Если спредов нет
It's not a bad thing to dream)))
And if you make a virtual exchange, where the "kotir" will be a cumulative of truly random numbers (the source, for example, cosmic radiation). There are no spreads (everything is random as it is...). Will the exchange holder make money or not? Here's what's interesting...
It won't work purely by chance, the players will still 'influence' the quotients. That's first of all.
And secondly, even if we imagine that players can't "influence" quotes, they can still "read" them.
Here, it still depends on the "power" of the manager himself and whether he has a passive or active position. And the number ("power") of players.
But if he is "passive", then he will lose.
Oh yeah, I forgot, it also depends on the k*r*a.
What's it got to do with players and karma? It's just random wandering, that's all. Players have no influence whatsoever but can read and trade.
Still traders will drain at about the speed of the spread. And there is no hope to make a strategy that will steadily pour.
I assume that this may appear in the near future as a "branded product" of a brokerage company.
What's it got to do with players and karma? It's just random wandering, that's all. Players have no influence whatsoever, but can read and trade.
What's it got to do with players and karma? It's just random wandering, that's all. Players have no influence whatsoever but can read and trade.
Still traders will drain at about the speed of the spread. And there is no hope to make a strategy that will steadily pour.
I assume that this may appear in the near future as a "branded product" of a brokerage company.
It won't work purely by chance, the players will still 'influence' the quotients. That's first of all.
And secondly, even if we imagine that players can't "influence" quotes, they can still "read" them.
Here, it still depends on the "power" of the manager himself and whether he is in a passive or active position. And the number ("power") of players.
But if he's "passive", he will lose.
Yes, I forgot, it also depends on the k*r*.
A living example, bookmakers (I don't know how to spell the word at heart) offices, and you see everything and don't influence the quotes.