The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 251
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Don't go to extremes.
This is one of the indicators that characterise the performance of a system. A system is a complex entity consisting of many parts that are hierarchically organised. Already due to this structure of the system, many different analysis tools may be required to analyse it comprehensively. A system, depending on its level of detail, can be seen as a multi-layered structure. But the same system can also be viewed as a whole, in which case the quality of its performance of a system function, i.e. its efficiency, is analysed.
Do you understand?
Then I don't understand why you are playing these guessing games) I wrote this to you a few pages ago. As well as about the percentage gain.
I don't know what you consider efficiency. I alone don't know the composite measure of 'goodness'. Gain percentage, as yusuf wrote is one of the indicators you need, but it doesn't take into account the risks that were. The profit factor takes risks into account to some extent. It takes better account if you change it a bit. In general, there are 2 classes of indicators. One is capital gains in absolute and relative terms and the other is income/risk. They need to be considered together.
At this rate we can discuss UDS for years and nobody will understand anything)).
At this rate, we could discuss UDS for years and no one would understand anything))
Don't you want to study the literature on the subject? If you think that UDS can be fully mastered through a forum thread, you are very much mistaken.
I see my task as the application of the DMV theory to the market. And not to teach this theory and technique of its use to the visitors of this thread. If I can confirm the applicability of UDS theory to the market with facts(account monitoring), then the interested person will open the book and study the subject. And this subject is very complicated and it takes a lot of work to master it. I can give advice if the need arises, clarify unclear points, demonstrate nuances, etc. But lectures are given in a lecture hall.
And to make it clearer, I will also mention that the UDS theory is still under development and is far from being complete. Many sensible dissertations are devoted to this topic, practically inaccessible to many because of the complexity of the research apparatus used in them.
Don't you want to study the literature on the subject? If you think that UDS can be fully mastered on a forum thread, you are greatly mistaken.
I see my task as applying the UDS theory to the market. And not to teach this theory and the technique of its use to the visitors of this thread. If I can confirm the applicability of UDS theory to the market with facts (account monitoring), the interested person will open the book and study the subject. And this subject is very complicated and it takes a lot of work to master it. I can give advice if the need arises, clarify unclear points, demonstrate nuances, etc. But lectures are given in a lecture hall.
And to make it clearer, I will also mention that the UDS theory is still under development, and is far from being complete. Many sensible dissertations are devoted to this subject, practically inaccessible to many people because of complexity of the research apparatus used in them.
I am convinced that if a person cannot explain to a non-specialist in this theory the essence in a few sentences, what the problem is and how it is solved, then either the person does not understand this theory or it is worthless. ;)
I don't consider it necessary to change your mind about anything. ;)))
You shouldn't) It's just that you've been boiling in your own world - inventing bicycles and picking up all the rakes and so on for years)) But maybe that's how new theories and approaches are born.
You're just boiling in your own world - inventing bicycles and picking up all the rakes and so on for years)) But maybe that's how new theories and approaches are born.
tol64:
Anyway, I won't insist/convince. Everyone makes their own choices. Maybe the universe wants you to go that way yourself and drink the whole cup to the bottom. ;)
avtomat:
Yes, yes. That is what the Universe wants !!! ;)))
Yes. The universe knows what it wants! Therefore, everyone is boiling in his own juice. ;)
... The tractor, meanwhile, is clearing living space in the universe:
;)
... The tractor, meanwhile, is clearing living space in the universe:
;)
Oleg, forget about the balance, give equity figures.
I don't think that would be right.