[Archive! - page 293
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Few people know, but the previous Mars-96 station was sent by booster due to a programming error in the opposite direction to Mars.
More than 50g? No, Lyosha, that's not a treatment, it's a disease.)
It's enough to bring the temp down. // Where to put the rest is the question... (and laughed drunkenly)))))))))))
Just kidding. We should have beaten the rest. Not the last time we'll be cheering!
I hope so.
The word "Hopefully." sounded a little scary.
How are you doing there Peter, don't scare us?
By the way, you should take >D3 && <D5 for colds.
for a cold "cure"...
by the way, not many people know the true meaning of the word "detsl"
who knows?
ZS: it's time to reincarnate the "smoking room" - it takes a long time to load the subreddits.
ZS: It's time to reincarnate the 'smoking room' - it's taking a long time to load the subreddits.
It's not "subtexts", it's "posts".
it's not "subj," it's "posts."
whatever - it's still a long time.
The gimmick is not that it is PR for a future president.
Look at the title of the article, the second word (highlighted). Do you know it? Strange that it is - in a newspaper like this.
The gimmick is not that it is PR for a future president.
Look at the title of the article, the second word (highlighted). Do you know it? Strange that it is - in a newspaper like this.
I know. The word is the word. Very expressive and clear. I was more concerned about the lack of a comma in the subheading. In a paper like this...
One more thing. I wouldn't want to argue with HER, but I would argue with HER :)
Regarding the comma: are you alluding to the emphasis on "though"? No, it's not underlined here. Just don't ask me why. I can't answer that (I didn't learn the rules at school) - but I'll write it right.
I know. A word as a word. Very expressive and clear.
The gimmick is not that it is PR for a future president.
Look at the title of the article, the second word (highlighted). Do you know it? Strange that it is - in a newspaper like this.
It seems to me that both mistakes ("handplucked" and "with her") are intentional. The article is sarcastic.