[Archive! - page 296
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
At least with an open count by polling station and publication of the results. As now, it is enough to bribe a dozen people, and it would be too expensive to bribe the commissions at each polling station. So these elections, as they are now, are simply a sham.
The electoral commissions and polling stations are organised by law by the local administration. Therefore there is no need to bribe anyone. A bonus of two to five thousand dollars "for the exemplary organization of elections" is practically legally paid to the management of the polling station. But not to all, but to those who ensured the necessary results. So the commissions are already engaged. That's it.
2. the cheating is not simple, it's complicated. Some decency still has to be observed, so the resource of the cheats is limited. A turnout of 20-30% gives a reserve of "free" ballots, but it is impossible to use it all. Observers, correspondents (some of them are stubborn fellows), leaks, uselessness, etc. get in the way.
Therefore, the total stuffing, including preliminary voting, home voting, "carousel" on absentee ballots and direct substitution of ballots is within the same +20...30%.
3. Consequently, even with such a regulated system anyone has the opportunity to influence the results of the election.
- come to the election by reducing the array of free ballots;
- to vote for a party which has a chance of passing the electoral threshold by suppressing its biases for the sake of the common cause. For example, for the SR or the CPRF.
- To film and record by any means any fraud observed and publish it on the internet, indicating the polling station, the time of the event, and if possible the names of the participants.
Such actions will contribute to the failure to achieve the planned 55 ... 65% of UR, which will be a great achievement and a huge incentive to fight in subsequent elections.
The drop chisels the stone.
3. Consequently, even under such a regulated system, anyone has the opportunity to influence the outcome of an election.
- come to the polls by reducing the array of free ballots;
- to vote for a party that has a chance of passing the electoral threshold by suppressing its biases for the sake of the common cause. For example, for the SR or the CPRF.
- To film and record by any means any fraud observed and publish it on the internet, indicating the polling station, the time of the event, and if possible the names of the participants.
Such actions will contribute to the failure to achieve the planned 55 ... 65% of UR, which will be a great achievement and a huge incentive to fight in subsequent elections.
The drop chisels the stone.
Bryansk. I looked at the list of answers in person. When asked, the aunt brushed me off - I do as I'm told! And I couldn't snitch, the aunt was familiar, she would have been in trouble.
...A bonus of $2,000 to $5,000 "for the exemplary organisation of elections" is almost legally paid to the precinct management. But not to all, but to those who ensured the necessary results. ...
what kind of nonsense is that? With all due respect, Victor, there is no other way to put it. The chairman of the precinct election commission is in no way tied to either turnout or results.
At all the meetings, public and private, the administration is demanding that businesses and businessmen ensure the desired vote in favour of the UR by any means necessary.
"For the convenience of voters", additional polling stations are being set up for municipal enterprises (at the vodokanal) and educational and children's institutions (at the university). Kindergarten teachers are waiting for absentee ballots, they have already been informed. The management of the enterprises has to sit at the polling station and supervise the voting (I wonder how?).
In the last election, student observers were paid to remain silent. They were told to be silent when students with absentee ballots were bussed in, their details were copied and they were let back on the bus, and the shuttle-baggers had never seen the ballot papers. I think that the shuttle buses did not drive around the city for free either. Six buses came to our polling station in the first half of the day alone.
All of this information and many others was not taken from the internet, but from specific people in the city where I have lived all my life and worked in different circles.
But today I am already getting scared. There has never been such a brazen racket as this before. I'm afraid that there may be an all-out ballot swapping.
At least I'll know where to go or how to get to them I was wondering how to get up there :)