[Archive! - page 78
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The bottom one's on the left.
That's just me messing around with the shadows. If you try hard... Grebennikov is an artist and a specialist in creating the illusion of dimensional space.
you have to look from afar and you can see that the shadows are at different angles
Well it's not a crime, the top one could have been taken a few minutes later.
It's funny to discuss this in all seriousness.
Well it's not a crime, the upper one could have been taken a few minutes later.
It's funny to discuss this in all seriousness.
i.e. first we took pictures of it flying and then it landed, taking into account that the difference of 10 degrees it flew for about 35-45 minutes. ) while remaining in place.
ZS: I understand that it's a montage )
If the power part (spring or some mechanism) is compact enough, there may be no shadow from it at this drop of light (it will be in the shadow of the platform). And that wooden platform with the hardware reeks strongly of mechanics, and that "round device" on top is probably a dynamometer.
P.S.
Those who are older should remember the rampant quackery in the late 80s and early 90s.
If you take a closer look (read) at Botanik, you are unlikely to want to accuse him of quackery.
Photo of Botanik was made by a professional photographer from the editorial office of "Tehnika Molodezhdy" magazine while preparing this article.
If you look (read) at Botanicus more closely, you are unlikely to be tempted to accuse him of quackery.
Botanik's photo was taken by a professional photographer from the editorial office of Tehnika Molodezhdy magazine when preparing the article.
If you look at Mavrodi, he is also pathetic. And he has "bilked" half the country.
If you look at Mavrodi, he is also pathetic. And he's "bilked" half the country.
I wasn't referring to the Nerd view. Read him and about him.
Who rules Russia.
About antigravity. I don't know what the argument is about. Let's take a scientific approach to it. Repeat Grebennikov's experience, at least with insect wings. If it works, then the rest works too.
I have no doubts about his experiments because such a device appeared at the exhibition of young inventors. It's very primitive, though.
The description has everything on how to repeat the experiment even without insect wings.
All innovations usually go through three stages in the development of attitudes towards them: it can't be - there's something about it - who doesn't know that. If you look a little wider, everything 'old' was once 'new' and everything 'new' was once already 'old' - History repeats itself.