[Archive! - page 49
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Askar, you've got to be kidding me. NYROBA doesn't like Prechter, his god is Neely.
Secondly, NYROBA's high flight of fancy hardly descends to such detailed markings, and even on small TFs. He is thinking in annual categories.
There is a third and a fourth, but that is enough.
Askar, you've got to be kidding me. NYROBA doesn't like Prechter, his god is Neely.
Secondly, NYROBA's high flight of fancy hardly descends to such detailed markings, and even on small TFs. He is thinking in annual categories.
There is a third and a fourth, but that is enough.
Good afternoon, question as a moderator: I would like to create a branch where I could create a database of dts on swap accrual for all pairs. How to do it correctly not to break the rules of the forum. Regards Sergey.
This action is unlikely to fall directly under the discussion of VCs: the swaps database is simply information concentrated in one place.
The problem is that the mere fact of its existence will lead to a discussion of VCs and comparisons between them, and that is a violation.
If you want to do something like that, organize data collection for the database in another forum and give a link to the results in your profile.
Good afternoon, question as a moderator: I would like to create a branch where I could create a database of dts on swap accrual for all pairs. How to do it correctly that would not break the rules of the forum. Regards Sergey
you could create a branch describing the idea of why this database is needed.
If the idea is profitable, you may create a database of swaps. If the idea is profitable, the software will be implemented.
This action is unlikely to fall directly under the discussion of VCs: the swaps database is simply information concentrated in one place.
The problem is that the mere fact of its existence will lead to a discussion of VCs and comparisons between them, which is a violation.
If you want to do something like that, organize data collection for the database in another forum, and give a link to the results in your profile.
Everything is clear, about the discussion of dts I think the question can be resolved by the abbreviated name of the dts: A.....i, F...m, etc., and who is interested in the full name, they can discuss in person. I think this will not be considered a violation?
Once again I ask you - the essence of this action? Why put the base (changing) swaps in a branch of the forum? If it can be done in a more professional and unobtrusive manner.
Everything is clear, about the discussion of dts I think the question can be resolved by the abbreviated name of the dts: A.....i, F...m, etc., and who is interested in the full name, they can discuss in person. I think this will not be considered a violation?
The topic is provocative, that's why there will be discussions. Better to do it on a third-party resource
I'll ask you one more time - what is the point of this? What's the point of putting the swap base on a forum thread? If it can be done in a more professional and unobtrusive way.