What form, let's assume a physical body, does time have? Your opinion. - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
When two protons get close to a certain distance, they start interacting with a force inversely proportional to the 5th power of distance (not Grandpa Coulomb's second power). But the peep is in the change of sign - they are attracted, the devils!
And what makes you think that there are any adjacent spaces, where is the proof?
Spaces are not adjacent. They simply exist as height-width-depth perceived by our consciousness.
A dog's consciousness is unable to perceive the third dimension.
A dog sees perfectly, but perceives alternately height and width or depth and height or width and depth.
And the fact that a dog is unable to perceive the third dimension with its consciousness does not mean that the third dimension does not exist.
It is unlikely that a dog can be convinced by evidence of the multidimensionality of space.
Spaces - they are not contiguous. They simply exist, just as height-width-depth perceived by our consciousness exists.
A dog's consciousness is unable to perceive the third dimension.
A dog sees perfectly, but perceives alternately height and width or depth and height or width and depth.
And the fact that a dog is unable to perceive the third dimension with its consciousness does not mean that the third dimension does not exist.
It is unlikely that a dog can be convinced by evidence of the multidimensionality of space.
We cannot see in the dark, but we have made a device with which we can see, if there are any other spaces, they can be found, not with our senses, but with devices, or by the influence of these spaces on anything.
Dogs perceive all 3 dimensions, otherwise they wouldn't be able to perceive 3 dimensional objects, which is stupid... and very stupid indeed. Dogs cannot perceive 3 dimensional space if it is drawn (or on a monitor) (i.e. as 2 dimensional). This mistake is unforgivable on your part
Spaces - they are not contiguous. They simply exist as height-width-depth perceived by our consciousness exists.
A dog's consciousness is unable to perceive the third dimension.
A dog sees perfectly, but perceives alternately height and width or depth and height or width and depth.
And the fact that a dog is unable to perceive the third dimension with its consciousness does not mean that the third dimension does not exist.
It is unlikely that a dog can be convinced by evidence of the multidimensionality of space.
What dog told you that? Clearly a vicious dog-hater!
Although..... on the Fourth of January you'll hear more than that.... It's still Tuesday in Cuba....
Spaces - they are not contiguous. They simply exist as height-width-depth perceived by our consciousness exists.
A dog's consciousness is unable to perceive the third dimension.
A dog sees perfectly, but perceives alternately height and width or depth and height or width and depth.
And the fact that a dog is unable to perceive the third dimension with its consciousness does not mean that the third dimension does not exist.
It is unlikely that a dog can be convinced by evidence that space is multidimensional.
What plane are we hoping to train in?
;)
We cannot see in the dark, but we have made a device with which we can see, if there are other spaces, we can find them, not with our senses, but with devices, or by the effect of these spaces on something.
Dogs perceive all 3 dimensions, otherwise they wouldn't be able to perceive 3 dimensional objects, which is stupid... and very stupid indeed. Dogs cannot perceive 3 dimensional space if it is drawn (or on a monitor)(that is in view of 2 dimensional). This mistake is unforgivable
It's a misconception...
A dog perceives, or rather sees, the third dimension by shifting its consciousness.
If an object moves quickly, the dog's consciousness does not have time to perceive it.
Such a moving object appears to a dog as an incomprehensible monster.
That's why they bark and chase after anything that moves.
As for humans, science already knows about the existence of at least nine dimensions.
It's just that your school knowledge is long out of date.
or maybe you mean: TIME -- MONEY
then we can talk about both form and density ;)))
and what does this have to do with adjacent spaces?
It's a fallacy...
A dog perceives, or rather sees, the third dimension by shifting its consciousness.
If an object moves quickly, the dog's consciousness does not have time to perceive it.
Such a moving object appears to a dog as an incomprehensible monster.
That's why they bark and chase after anything that moves.
As for humans, science already knows about the existence of at least nine dimensions.
It's just that your school knowledge is long out of date.
Barking is related to feelings of danger or joy, what other switches are there, this is nonsense... You're making conjectures that don't even stand up to logic, let alone scientific facts.
Show me the scientific evidence for the existence of nine dimensions, at least a link.
The Gauss-Ostrogradsky theorem, if applied to spaces of dimension 3...2...1 and further 0, gives exactly such result. In other words, we (three dimensional) see a zero-dimensional object from two particles, interaction forces of which (opposite in sign in these spaces of different dimensionality) are balanced and define the system size. For different observers this size (of a tiny hole) will be different.
Are you sure that it will be legitimate to apply any theorem to mythical spaces? Zero dimensional object? This is an abstraction invented by demagogues. And all the rest is speculation.
It's just that your school knowledge is long out of date.
I must be missing something.....
But, I have never trusted the teachers who so delightfully tell me what an ant thinks and what motivates an ant carrying a spruce needle to its anthill.
About what verbatim said Khan Batyi before a battle in so-and-so year.
About what is really in V.V.'s head. Putin.