Technical analysis - A scam for beginners? - page 41
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Tell me, can you show us all a successful trader's stats? That all unsuccessful traders were ashamed!
I'm not talking about me, my stubborn one.
I'll tell you a terrible secret - I don't trade.
I'm running the turkeys in the tester. Get creative.
Tore the Windows off and I can't get Webmoney back.
I'm in a bind, I can't stop.
The tester's all red and I'm sweating.
And my palms are sweaty.
Tell me, can you show us all a successful trader's stats? It would make all unsuccessful traders feel ashamed!
Let's show it to the public and stop hiding it in the basement ))))))
I wouldn't mind showing my results...
That's not why I came to the forum.
As a flub:
There are a lot of great, savvy guys pushing TA to new and new horizons.
You look at their efforts and it just makes your hair stand on end. They do such a great job...
But this case is time-consuming and they don't have time to practice. You can't sit on two chairs.
That's why they're chasing robots. And rightly so. That's their level.
But let's not forget that one of the most lucrative jobs without the extreme
is sludge dumps.
This work is dirty, dusty and labour-intensive.
Sometimes you pull out a strip, cast-iron by its composition.
Grain is like steel. If you hit a rim, it leaves a nick, but there's not a trace of it on the rim itself.
And there's 40 strips across for some reason.
They used to make...
Is that damascus? Looks like India...
My grandfather had a barrel that he said sagged under his finger.
That's what he called damascus.
let's open it up to the public, stop hiding it in the basement ))))))
I wouldn't mind showing my results...
♪ let's get it out there, don't be shy ♪
Is that damascus?
My grandfather had a barrel - he said it sagged under his finger.
How long have they been making barrels out of damascus steel?
And by the way, what kind of gun did my grandfather have?
And what did he do with it?
Was it used to press a cabbage?
That's not why I came to the forum.
As a flub:
There are a lot of great, savvy guys pushing TA to new and new horizons.
You look at their efforts and it just makes your hair stand on end. It's a lot of work...
But this case is time-consuming and they don't have time for practice. You can't sit on two chairs.
That's why they're chasing robots. And rightly so. That's their level.
But let's not forget that one of the most lucrative jobs without the extreme
is sludge dumps.
This work is dirty, dusty and labour-intensive.
Sometimes you pull out a strip, cast-iron by its composition.
Grain is like steel. If you hit a rim, it leaves a nick, but not a trace on the rim itself.
And there's 40 strips across for some reason.
They used to do that...
Some sludge.....
Keep it simple - really, as you so rightly point out, there are a lot of guys who talk on forums as they move something and expand some horizons. There are a lot of them.
And when you look at PAMMs in brokerage companies - it really makes your hair curl. But here is the problem - these guys are only telling but from investing in brokerage companies and PAMMs nobody became a millionaire - as far as I know. This is the great paradox of TA.
What do you think about the robots? Look at the results on this forum - as far as I understood neuronetworks rule. But as much as TA is defined here, neural networks are not TA
1. The nerve grinders only ruled for 1 year, ATS 2007. The next year the pipsatores were steering, and now one simple wizard is steering again :) But it only rules the balance, and personally I like other EAs.
2. I won't argue about what TA is: this question probably has a direct bearing on religion. Of course, nervewrackers are not classic TA, here I agree.
Mathemat:
2. I won't argue about what TA is: the question probably has a direct bearing on religion. Of course, nerve-racking is not classic TA, I agree.
Nervosets and TA are different things, and I don't see how they can be compared.
TA is a method of analysis, which, by the way, is why it has the letter "A" in the abbreviation.
NS is a data processing method.