Technical analysis - A scam for beginners? - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
speculators made more on buckwheat, but Buffet refused to invest his yards in them :)
who and on what?
He's the one who screwed up.....
what is mah sitting on? :)
FAGOTT, you must have just had an epiphany. Not all the knowledge you can be given will be available for you to use. You just can't do it.
Any science is simply a system of patterns and rules that not everyone can use.
Everything is linear and simple only in virtual mathematical models, subject to the will of their creator. Turn it on and everything works. In the real world, it's different.
Does TA work? It works as much as you can use it.
It's different for everyone. If you want something solid and reliable to make predictions, it does not exist in any area.
You just have to do something else to be convinced of that.
What's Mach sitting on? :)
who and on what?
It doesn't make sense to project interest on any amount. What works for tens or hundreds of kilobucks will not necessarily work for yards and vice versa.
FAGOTT, you must have just had an epiphany. Not all the knowledge you can be given will be available for you to use. You just can't do it.
Any science is simply a system of patterns and rules that not everyone can use.
Everything is linear and simple only in virtual mathematical models, subject to the will of their creator. You switch it on and everything works. In real life everything is different.
Does TA work? It works as much as you can use it.
It's different for everyone. If you want something more reliable and profound for making predictions, there is nothing like it in any area.
You just have to do something else to be convinced of that.
So physics doesn't work for everyone? Is gravity the preserve of the chosen few? And under normal conditions, one fire will boil water at 100 degrees and the other at 567 degrees?
One has 2 + 2 = 4 and the other has 683 because one sells and the other buys? And the interaction of two material bodies has the same accuracy as the prediction of the price in Forex using a standard indicator?
He's the one who screwed up.....
So the physics does not work for everyone? Gravitation is the destiny of the select few? And in normal conditions, on one fire, water will boil at 100 degrees and the other at 567 degrees?
One has 2 + 2 = 4 and the other has 683 because one is selling and the other is buying? And the interaction of two material bodies has the same accuracy as the prediction of forex prices using a standard indicator?
i thought it was the same thing...
That's the problem. These are slightly different things, it's a fundamental difference.
Can you earn 30% a year steadily ? I can... it's not hard. If you put in 1 million roubles that's 300k profit right ? What if you go up and find investors who don't know where to put their stolen 90s dough ? О.... that's already 30m roubles (this is the real amount and not a big one, people carry it in bags, you know, those old gym bags)... what share are you interested in ? Let's say 15% of profits.... 9 million a year profit.... 1.350 million is yours. Not enough ? Try again... and don't forget not to withdraw your money but reinvest it too.... So... Let's calculate how much money you will have in 5 years... 12,208,185 rubles. Not enough? Keep working... who's stopping you...
Who said you had to put 100 quid (let's say 1000 quid) and raise all the dough from scratch? 30% is a shit... although it's not the best result, but you will become a rich man.
Decide what you want...money or grail.
And this man doubts TA? not so long ago he had an indicator that predicted with >50% accuracy, but for some reason a lousy 8% error rate drained everything - and he doesn't need an MM!
Maybe he needs to read this: