You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Not half. For example, the price has passed five levels without fail. The loss on closed inverted orders equals -1 * 4 = -4 steps. The profit is equal to +1 +2 +3 +4 = +10 steps! Total +10 - 4 = +6 steps of net profit!
I agree +6 steps of net profit. Once the price goes back by half a step, this net profit will disappear as we have a row of orders that will be abruptly miscalculated. I.e. the total volume of the position becomes high enough, and any momentary move downwards kills all the profits gained on the root......
That's kind of how you got him so...banged up???? What the hell's a high profit? I don't see it.
Why, it's a pretty good one. It's just a sketch so far, but you can already see that the strategy is quite workable. I think that if you work hard, the profit will be at a high level and the drawdown can be reduced. The main thing is that it is not plummeting.
Why not, it's a pretty good one. It's just a sketch so far, but you can already see that the strategy is quite workable. I think that if you work hard, the profit will be high and the drawdown can be reduced. The main thing is that it is not plummeting.
You make me laugh) Calling a palisade with that kind of slack a non-salient... I thought you were joking.
Well, I thought he was joking, too...... it turns out he's not.
Again the question is what condition is used to fix the profit and open the next series of orders????
Most likely by the amount of equity over balance.
I'll try to guess Yuri's next moves.
1. increase in the number of steps / knees (15 may not be enough for a long period of time).
2. as a consequence - pulling up the initial deposit to the progressive drawdown value, as a result of point 1.
3. Then we return to p.1 and continue until we finally adjust it to the history.
Funny) Calling a palisade with that kind of drawdown non-salient... I thought you were joking.
He who laughs last has the last laugh. The last run was the first to test the performance of the strategy. This is the second run with increased profits. I hope you are not as laughing now as you were the first time. And this is just the beginning of the work on the Expert Advisor. I believe in Katana, he knows what he says.
Most likely by the amount of equity over balance.
I'll try to guess Yuri's next moves.
1. increase in the number of steps / knees (15 may not be enough for a long period of time).
2. as a consequence - pulling up the initial deposit to the progressive drawdown value, as a result of point 1.
3. return to p.1 and so on, until we finally fit the story.
....We should trust Katana, he knows what he's talking about.
Wrong, the number of levels was reduced.
Why is the test only from September 2011? Didn't they let you download more stories?)