LET'S SAY THAT ... - page 11
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
"THE DOGGIE PRINCIPLE"
-
Somewhere near the volcano there is a simple, interesting mechanism dug into the ground, representing a rack with teeth from a car car rack jack. On the rail, a weight is suspended on a dog. During strong earthquakes, the weight is lifted up the lath.
-
The doggie has its own character. It does not jump onto the upper pin of the lath when the ground moves with a very low amplitude. Nor does it jump over when the vibration amplitude is large and takes place over a long period of time, i.e. it only works when the vibration speed is high.
The dog does not allow the weight to sink, it serves as a "rectifier" of the ground oscillation. Therefore, the weight only moves upwards on the rail.
-
Question for reflection: will the doggie work in forex and if so, how should it be implemented?
"THE DOGGIE PRINCIPLE"
-
Somewhere near the volcano, a simple and interesting mechanism is buried in the ground, representing a rack with teeth from a car car rack jack. On the rail, a weight is suspended on a dog. During strong earthquakes, the weight is lifted up the lath.
-
The doggie has its own character. It does not jump onto the upper pin of the lath when the ground moves with very low amplitude. Nor does it jump over when the vibration amplitude is large and takes place over a long period of time, i.e. it only works when the vibration speed is high.
The dog does not allow the weight to sink, it serves as a "rectifier" of the ground oscillation. Therefore, the weight only moves upwards on the rail.
-
Question for thought: would the doggie work in forex and if so, how should it be implemented?
interesting question and an example no less:)
"ПРИНЦИП СОБАЧКИ"
...
-
Вопрос для размышления: будет ли собачка работать на форексе и если да, то как она должна быть реализована?
will be, I just started on p6 about it, but I'm a little bit, but don't take a primitive view of the model like all currencies depend on each other - on a D1 price bottom - yes, but at the current moment on M1 the charts are totally different, what - only moments, what not on the forum :)"THE DOGGIE PRINCIPLE"
-
Somewhere near the volcano, a simple and interesting mechanism is buried in the ground, representing a rack with teeth from a car car rack jack. On the rail, a weight is suspended on a dog. During strong earthquakes, the weight is lifted up the lath.
-
The doggie has its own character. It does not jump onto the upper pin of the lath when the ground moves with very low amplitude. Nor does it jump over when the vibration amplitude is large and takes place over a long period of time, i.e. it only works when the vibration speed is high.
The dog does not allow the weight to sink, it serves as a "rectifier" of the ground oscillation. Therefore, the weight only moves upwards on the rail.
-
Question for thought: would the doggie work in forex and if so, how should it be implemented?
It won't.
I'm glad I'm not alone in my musings/search, I think Richie is also thinking about it, by the way I was waiting for gold to fall yesterday, and I expect a weakening of the dollar in the coming months
Sorry, but I'll leave this honest audience for now - things to do, though :)
OK. Then I'll ask, may I? "Will Maxwell's Demon work on fore (or fondue) or not?
I find it hard to see how it can work without any energy input. It only uses energy for friction - similar to spreads, swaps, commissions etc.
- here are the peaks missed... while reading this, it's better to compare with mountains!
Я вообще с трудом представляю как он может работать без каких либо затрат энергии. Тут энергия тратится только на трение - по аналогии спред, свопы, комиссия и т.п.
No. The basic energy of measurement as applied to the market is that in order to understand whether a trade is losing or profitable, it must be executed. Although if you approach "Demon" from the point of view of MM. MM, then you are right and sufficient completely.