Avalanche - page 404
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Halin, where is the answer to goldtrader's question there ?
sllawa3:
glory, i can attach a dumbass bunch of reports here.
AND EVERYTHING WORKS GREAT ON THE REAL!
I started this owl with 1 700p on exp, their leverage is 1 to 1000.
Raised my depo to 9800 in about 8 trading days.
Needed money so I withdrew all profits, the remaining 1,700 ramped up to about 5,000, then successfully drained.
I stress REALLY PROFIT TRADING, WITH STOPACKS this bot needs 13800, from Monday - Wednesday I will launch a new real. If you want I can do it demonstratively I am not sorry. If you want, I can do it demonstrably, I am not sorry. And if you open an account with 13,800 you are practically 100 % sure it won't go down. The maximum drawdown will be 50-60 percent.
The other version has been trading steadily on real account for two months already, initial depositary is 23 000 rubles and the leverage is 1000. At the moment the current account surplus is 78 000. This version has 20-30% drawdown, but total loss is excluded. I STRESS THAT THE DRAWDOWN IS COMPLETELY EXCLUDED. Once during this period triggered a stop loss of 4,500 approximately. Stopak in this case is when the volume of open positions becomes too large, and the bot starts to close them forcibly, usually fixing part of unprofitable deals.
sllawa3:
Slava, i can attach a ton of reports here.
AND EVERYTHING WORKS GREAT ON THE REAL!
I've been running this owl with 1 700p on exp, their leverage is 1 to 1000.
Raised my depo to 9800 in about 8 trading days.
Needed money so I withdrew all profits, the remaining 1,700 ramped up to about 5,000, then successfully drained.
I stress REALLY PROFIT TRADING, WITH STOPACKS this bot needs 13800, from Monday - Wednesday I will launch a new real. If you want I can do it demonstratively I am not sorry. If you want, I can do it demonstrably, I am not sorry. And if you open an account with 13,800, you are practically 100 percent sure it won't go down. The maximum that will be a drawdown of 50-60 percent.
The other version has been trading steadily on real account for two months already, initial depositary is 23 000 rubles and the leverage is 1000. At the moment the current account surplus is 78 000. This version has 20-30% drawdown, but total loss is excluded. I STRESS THAT PLUM ENTIRELY EXCLUDED. Once during this period triggered a stop loss of 4,500 approximately. Stopak in this case is when the volume of open positions becomes too large, and the bot starts to close them forcibly, usually fixing part of unprofitable deals.
You, Galina, are not thinking in mathematical terms. What difference does it make how much you have on deposit? It all depends not on the deposit amount but on strategy parameters, leverage and minimum lot size in a particular brokerage company. For Cent accounts we need 100 times less deposit not to drain the account.
And if you are allowed to trade 0.01 lot, you can reduce initial deposit 100 times.
And if you are allowed to trade 0.01 lot, you can reduce your deposit by another 100 times.
A multiplier, though!
a multiplier, though!
Not bad, I wish I had the password more, you can put it in my personal message.
If it continues to malfunction like this, I'll upload it to onyx monitoring...
It's a dabble, though.
Stat advantage is slightly better than the casino.
Report shortened.
Statement: 2088752066 - FreeLance
The code is large, I suspect a tweak in the algorithm.
But the chart already shows a negative maturity expectation. On the 960 trade the drawdown was more than 2 times greater than the previously accumulated profit.
This figure perfectly demonstrates the main disadvantage of martin-like strategies. The main disadvantage is its peculiarity, i.e. money management. In such strategies on 1720 trades one can hardly expect the initial balance to double. that is why such strategies do not make sense from the start. The smoothness of the balance curve, as a rule, does not allow for rapid exponential growth of the deposit, as in strategies with original money management.
Yes, the code is big. I agree that you can't expect huge profits, and it will end up being a drain. And what does fitting in the algorithm mean?
Yes, the code is big. I agree that one should not expect huge profits and will fail in the end. And what does the fitting mean in the algorithm?
For example, if the trailing arm didn't fit, I added a linear regression and started to close using it, if it didn't fit, I added something else.
I just gave an example, i.e. there are rules that affect trading, but i don't know why they are needed at all and why exactly these rules are used.
For example, a trailing arm did not fit, so I added a linear regression and started closing using it, it did not fit, so I added something else.
I just gave an example, i.e. there are rules that affect trading, but i don't know why they are needed and why exactly these rules are used.
Ah, I see. I haven't used any indicators in the above mentioned EA; I open trade operation at any point and it trades continuously. The only thing I experimented with was the width of the channel, static and dynamic, I think I was fine-tuning here.