Avalanche - page 234

 
rumata1984 >>:

Спасибо за поддержку. Я форексом не очень давно занимаюсь, чуть больше года, мне еще учиться и учиться (конечно, не маржу и стоимость пункта считать). А вот Галина - она ведь профессиональный трейдер с большим стажем, т.е. это же и есть ее работа. И этот товарищ - E_mc2 - он всех нас без разбора мешает с грязью.

E_mc2, мы делом занимаемся, а твоя критика - мелка и нелепа. Если ты такой умный, возьми и сделай лучше. Сделай лучше, чем получилось у меня или у khorosh. Редкий пример тунельного инертного мышления: ты, как начал про маржу кричать страниц 100 назад, так до сих пор и продолжаешь. Все уже поняли давно, что это не принципиальный момент сейчас, один ты восхищаешься своему открытию: на неттинге маржа ввдое меньше. Эврика, еб...!

He has mastered only point value calculation and margin requirements since 2002. At this rate, in 50 years he will understand something in programming, although for a competent person 1 month is enough to master MQL4.

 
rumata1984 >>:

Спасибо за поддержку. Я форексом не очень давно занимаюсь, чуть больше года, мне еще учиться и учиться (конечно, не маржу и стоимость пункта считать). А вот Галина - она ведь профессиональный трейдер с большим стажем, т.е. это же и есть ее работа. И этот товарищ - E_mc2 - он всех нас без разбора мешает с грязью.

E_mc2, мы делом занимаемся, а твоя критика - мелка и нелепа. Если ты такой умный, возьми и сделай лучше. Сделай лучше, чем получилось у меня или у khorosh. Редкий пример тунельного инертного мышления: ты, как начал про маржу кричать страниц 100 назад, так до сих пор и продолжаешь. Все уже поняли давно, что это не принципиальный момент сейчас, один ты восхищаешься своему открытию: на неттинге маржа ввдое меньше. Эврика, еб...!


You're all millionaires, I see. Margin is one side. If I understand correctly. If you correctly understand this, then in the first step we open the lot 0.02 that will be the same as 0.01 on netting. Hence, we can conclude that the lot 0.02 spread will be paid for 0.01 on netting. On the second rollover when locking the lot will be 0.04 that is the same as 0.02 on netting. This means that if we lock the lot we will pay the 0.04 spread. The difference with the netting for the first step will be 0.03. It means that only by the second step we have paid 0.03 extra spread for the lot. On the third reverse we need to lock 0.08 which at netting will correspond to 0.04 lot. So the difference on the third step will be 0.07 extra lot of spread. I hope you can find the price in money and calculate how much the spread will be for the 0.07 lot. And then of course more. You guys are the breadwinners of the brokerage companies. V.I.P. clients of any dtC. Not to mention that the swaps will also eat up the deposit... I understand that all these costs are nothing to you.

You are re-inventing the wheel ... Well, this is ridiculous -)))) It's been done for a long time. I think it's been on Alpari since 2008. There's already 20 versions of such an adviser) And you here are like inventors of the wheel)))) I do not even want to remember that this idea with a trivial reverse martin ... well, a long time before Forex... since the stock exchanges. The topic has been discussed up and down for decades. They have the nerve to say so ... Open your eyes ... everything was done long ago. They were smarter people over there... they came out with more intelligent things, not like yours.
They're in business... Google a couple of lines and you'll see it's all been done before you. Delawares...

I gotta be honest with you... the CU itself isn't interesting at all. I've been through it since 2005. I know it well, as all those who have long been in the market, too, probably went through this subject)). Perhaps rightly said above. There is a process of burning, a thread that floods, worms topikstareta people already put in the netluna. In serious topics with normal topic topic starters not on the topic sort of muddle. And here is a dump. He's got a negative thing to say. The starter himself is such a pisser that it's a sin not to flub here. And they're making a goddamn business out of themselves.
 
khorosh >>:

Да куда уж ему - с 2002 года пока освоил только расчёт стоимости пункта и маржинальные требования. При таких темпах лет через 50 что-нибудь поймёт и в программировании, хотя грамотному человеку для освоения MQL4 достаточно 1 месяца.


And you've learned programming, but you haven't mastered margins and pips.) You didn't have the brains for it. And a normal person needs only ten minutes to do it. Well, go learn it.
 
E_mc2 >>:



Don't strain yourself ))))

 
khorosh >>:

А ты попробуй поступи и закончи МФТИ, а потом и аспирантуру, как это сделал rumata1984, тогда будет ясно кто дебил. Что касается маржи, так на данном этапе, когда проверяются только основные принципы работоспособности лавины её учёт не принципиален. Можно взять при тестировании заведомо большой депозит и об экономии маржи не думать. Есть много более важных факторов влияющих на результат, над которыми надо работать в первую очередь.

Советник выложенный rumata1984 и Галиной, является сырым, промежуточным вариантом, служащим для проверки принципа стратегии и нельзя к нему предъявлять требования,

как к законченному продукту. Если успешность стратегии при тестировании подтвердится, в окончательном варианте, я уверен, будет реализована схема с максимальной экономией маржи и ещё многое другое о чём ты даже не догадываешься.



Bgagagag)) That's hilarious...naive. These days any idiot with a dad and a mum with money can graduate from any university. Even a doctorate. Moreover, if you have a diploma, it does not mean that you are finished)). Any schoolboy knows that you can buy a diploma easily and simply.) Don't clown around... he wrote with such pathos that he graduated from university - I think he got the Nobel Prize.
 
Galina >>:


Слежу переодически за веткой.
НИКАКОГО ВРАНЬЯ ЧО СТОРОНЫ АВТОРА НЕ ЗАМЕТИЛА !
СПЛОШНЫЕ ОСКОРБЛЕНИЯ ТОЛЬКО СО ТОРОНЫ ФОРУМЯН,
И при этом, что паразительно, отчеты которые выкладывают люди покрайней мере показывают все наглядно.
Ладно, не буду Вам уподобляться.
Только конкретика.

Oh, man... I've run this "strategy" in my tester many, many times. Exactly as the GREAT one suggested. Always a bust, always a bust, always a bust... I could write for a long time - by the number of tests performed. People are rightly outraged. And what's being posted is done using some of the principles inherent in the original... I won't say TC.
A bicycle and an aeroplane are also means of moving from one point to another. But they at least allow you to move to a specified point.
Avalanche doesn't... No, I'm lying. If you apply the analogy - then Avalanche always brings down on you, but not what the "kick-topik" originally promised so sweetly to everyone, but just the opposite - collapse.
Download an expert from here who EXACTLY does what Iron-John originally promised everyone and you'll shut up.
Sorry.

 
PapaYozh >>:

не смешите, учеба в ВУЗе не такой уж сильный аргумент.
Я с такими дубоголовыми гражданами пересекался, что мозг отказывается верить в то, что у него школа за плечами есть. А потом глядишь - и ВУЗ отсидел и аспирантуру (не в армию же ему идти)

Yes, yes.)) Someone here on the forum already threw this expression: ... people with higher, but no secondary, education.

(I threw it in my notebook, but forgot about the author.)

 
khorosh >>:

При такой прибыльности можно получать маржинколл 1 раз в квартал и даже чаще, если каждую неделю снимать прибыль.

Не так страшен маржинколл, как его малюют.

Результат за последние полгода с 01.11.2009. Рост депозита более чем в 30 раз!




Enough of this painting. Even I, who is 0 in programming, cannot be surprised by these pictures. And any coder with a lot of experience will be surprised. There are a lot of such pictures here. Any programmer at this forum can make better pictures in the tester. Decided to show off with pictures from the tester. If you're gonna show off, post pictures from a real account.
 
E_mc2 >>:


Да хватит уже эту живопись выкладывать. Даже меня который в програмировани 0 этими картинками не удивить. А любого кодера который со стажем уверен и подавно. Тут таких картинок мульён. Любой програмер на этом форуме может ещё круче в тестере картинки нарисовать. Решил попонтоваца картинками с тестера. Если уж решил повыпендриваца то выкладывай картинки с реального счёта.


In fact, I don't quite understand your aggressiveness.
There are supporters of the avalanche (let them live and drain), and there are opponents of it (let them do the same).
There are people who really trade and earn, and there are those who just shake the air. There is also the avalanche author - he is from another planet.
Take a philosophical attitude. You must respect every point of view, even if in your opinion it is wrong. Of course, I don't mean some of the topicstarter's statements that are at variance with the fundamentals of mathematics, it must be treated simply as the ravings of a madman (or alien).
There was a period when I too tried to prove something to him. I realised he was impenetrable... Gave it up. If you read the thread - probably paying attention to the fact that he only answers the questions - which he knows the answer. Those questions that would immediately knock out an avalanche - he prefers not to notice.
This is called a simple and clear word - schizophrenia. i.e. a distorted and selective perception of reality. So be it. It is not good to make fun of sick people.
That one can extract quite a good profit for some time from such a la Locomartin masterpiece is clear to everybody ... It is also clear to all (at least to those who have some experience of trading), that this method will inevitably lead to Margin Call. The question is how to improve this algorithm (through various improvements), so that the Margin Call comes later than the doubling of the deposit.
But it is impossible, or rather, it is possible but only in theory ... and the chances are 50/50, like roulette ... The avalanche can hold for a year and you'll manage to withdraw your funds, then the profit will go, and you can sapped on the first day. That's probably clear to everyone. And those who post stats, and accounts for monitoring - are not more than just having fun. I am absolutely convinced that none of these highly respected people will ever use this method in real trading :))).
IMHO.

SZS: A person can play roulette in a virtual casino for fun with demo money, and enjoy the profits. Just for the psychological relaxation. But it's absolutely does not mean that he will ever play in the casino for real money. It's a completely different thing.
 
What a theme! It's like a freak show.

The standard question for those who decide to show the world their brilliant idea: "Why?!"