Avalanche - page 188
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
десятки разных стратегий и советников смотрю, оптю, памяти на всех не хватает, что там и как. Но 200, однозначно мало, хотя бы 1500$.Ловлю себя на мысли, что тоже, как и Вы попал под гипнох этой млин лавины:) Наверно пока не доведу до логического конца, т.е. пока не сольюсь, не успокойюсь:)
It takes $2,000 not to drain from 2008 or 2006 as you write. You don't need it for an experiment. The task is not to losesay a week, a month, increase the deposit. Then you will withdraw it. That is all. On page 184, you can see a two-week stack.
The task is as follows. We take two stages.
1. 200$ either drain or raise depo to 1000$, then withdraw half.
2. 500$ or we drain or raise the deposit up to 2500$,
If the purpose of step 1 is not achieved, we admit that lexandros, Matemat and others are right. Katana will publicly repent :)
If the goal of p.1 is achieved, and p.2 is not achieved (sinking after reaching $ 1000), combat draw:)
If he reaches goal point 2 at $2500, lexandros, Matemat and others will pour ashes on their heads.
I'm for option 2, so it's a tie.)
Подписываюсь... если не будет слива - публично посыплю голову чем угодно - и заинвестируюсь:) советника не надо - давайте памм
A pamm will not do. The goal is not to prove that there will be no plum. I totally agree with you, there will eventually be a run-off.The goal is to withdraw quickly, as far as I understood that's what Katana suggested in the beginning, then start again
with the minimum amount.
It takes $2,000 not to drain from 2008 or 2006 as you write. You don't need it for the experiment. The task is not to losesay a week, a month, increase the deposit. Then you will withdraw it. That is all. On page 184, the state has been posted for 2 weeks.
I agree, but I do it better - not to drain than to earn:) paradox:)
A pamm will not do. The goal is not to prove that there will be no plum. I totally agree with you, there will eventually be a run-off.The task is to withdraw money quickly, as far as I understood that is what Katana suggested in the beginning, then start again
with the minimum amount.
I'm looking at the test... If you take away all the nuances of real money, then everything is not so clear-cut.
вот смотрю на тест... если отмести все нюансы реала, то, не все так однозначно.
Tests are good. With a run since 2006 and a $2,000 depo, what is the drawdown and profit?rumata1984 wrote :>>
I'm posting a new version of the EA on the topic under discussion. Description of settings in the code itself. If you have any questions about it, please ask me or Galina.
Please post a picture of optimal backtest from 2006 or 2008.
Tests are good. Running since 2006 and $2000 depo what is the drawdown and profit?running...
Усреднение плюс Мартингейл...
14% in two years? Screw it right out of the gate. And if you increase the lot by 10 times, also screwed. The wrong profit for a martin.