![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
By dropping/selling the pound and franc you are essentially playing the gbp/chf rate
if you know how to play it, why do you need a stat arb? play it directly on gbp/chf
//-----------------------------
I don't create or get a pretty picture on purpose.
I monitor the chart and wait for the picture to become so "beautiful" to implement the entry.
покапая/продавая фунт и франк ты по сути играешь на курсе gbp/chf
если ты умеешь на нем играть, зачем тебе стат. арб? играй напрямую на gbp/chf
You have taken one currency example out of this thread. And you're getting a little "hung up" on it. Forget about those currencies. There's been very little trading in them for a long time now.It's futures instruments that are traded here. Commodities and stock markets.
I remember currency trading like a "bad dream" now.
Я не пойму, причем здесь заглядывание в будущее?
Think about it.
because your statement:
The coloured price lines are essentially the same MAs, and their relative position will not change if I change coefficients from 1.1 to 1.8.
what you're basically saying is: "I can play cross-rate gbp/chf with wagons".
Then it begs the question: why bother with synthetics, play gbp/chf directly
---
yeah by the way, i don't deny, maybe on some instruments the ratio behaves better than on zotolo/silver or pound/frank
but if you take those two spreads then it's no easier to play them than currencies
---
to 365441010
i think it's a good idea to get a good feel for the market and it's a good idea to get a good feel for the market
No one is arguing with that.
But this pair got here by accident!
Almost no one trades currencies and crosses here for a long time. See the last post on the previous page.
That's why it is unclear what you want to prove.
and with its pretty pictures, it can be misleading.
---
and you've got the wrong approach to spread research.
you have to chart the synthetic instrument first and then evaluate it
and not get carried away by the "slanted" chart of the indictor
I wanted to prove that your turkey is dangerous, it has a logical flaw.
and with its pretty pictures, it can be misleading.
---
and you have the wrong approach to spread research.
you have to chart the synthetic instrument first and then evaluate it
you don't want to get carried away by a picture of a "slanted" instrument.
I don't think it's wrong to use slanted charting as an indication of future trends, you need to draw a SPREAD CHART indicator first, then assess its perspectives in order to trade with currencies.