You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Taking into account that this is a MQL forum I want to recommend that you use the strategy generator of Mr. Reshetov. As I understand it generates ready to use strategies in MQL4. I admire him how fast he managed to start new project and to make it workable (actually I haven't tested it yet). Wish him success!
Thank you!
Only the rabbits multiply rapidly. I do not have too free time to fully engage in this project. I'm a trader, not a programmer.
Hello!
New version of Forex Strategy Builder v2.8.2.1 is ready.
I for one don't like slack at all... what slack means...
Thank you! Nevertheless, there are also parameters such as number of trades, profitability, expected payoff.
This is how to choose the best strategy from the list:
Yuri Reshetov, your opinion is very interesting too.
where there is less drawdown and a higher expectation of return
this one's the best.
where there is less drawdown and a higher expectation of return
this one's the best.
Thank you!
And this drawdown (reflected in the optimizer) is the maximal drawdown of the initial deposit, right?
However, I suppose the equity drawdown from some local highs may be so-so... :)
And if the expo starts working on the real account at such a moment...
Shouldn't the lot (in fact, the risk) be calculated on the basis of "such" maximum drawdowns?
In general, how to deal with the number of deals?
where there is less drawdown and a higher expectation of return
this one's the best.
Where there is less drawdown and more trades + more FS.
Where there is less drawdown and more trades + more FS.
I don't agree with you...you have one transaction averaging 178 and my choice is 919 the difference is obvious...
I don't agree with you... you have one transaction averaging 178 and my choice is 919... the difference is plain to see...
And I'm not asking you to agree with me. I gave my opinion. IOW is not the most important indicator.
Where there is less drawdown and more trades + more FS.
Ok! But there is an opinion that the FV for real should be > 5/year.
And here, who is counting what?
Found a mistake (from my point of view).
If "Market" - "Data period" is checked "Delete data before", but "Maximum number of bars" is enough to make the start period earlier than "Deleted" :), then ... (apparently the Min. of two values is taken). If "Maximum number of bars" is insufficient, then ... in short the parameter 'Delete data before' turns out to be useless.
'
Concerning 're-engineering' - yes, I got tired of inserting 'stubs' (SlotTypes/maMethod/IndicatorParam() etc.), and in an unfamiliar language, and with 'OOP' as well.