You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
He who is not a liberal in his youth! - is a scoundrel!
and he who is not a conservative in his old age is a fool.
The point is not to have one thing, but to constantly change back and forth.
If you change back and forth, it'll be rubbish.
You need a balanced approach.
what is the point?
In china, they know who's next long before that. They have firebombs, they do not care about the outside world and its values.
But everyone trades with them and does not make a fuss.
And they are developing economically, they have production facilities, industry is growing, Chinese goods are not the worst.
They are doing pretty good ... maybe someone wants to give them an orange and pink tulip banana revolution?
We need to move forward and develop, not look back at those who are worse off.
Especially since China is self-sufficient, they have been stewing in their own juices for a long time, they are used to it. And we have already tasted freedom, and going back to isolation would be death.
You can also think of North Korea, what is the point of all this? We need to move forward, develop, not look back at those who have it worse.
25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.
All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.
25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.
All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.
25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.
All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.
We can start forming a citation book:
"If you want a powerful army..."
"A citizen's life is sacred, but the highest value is the state."
25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.
All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.
A typical example of propaganda to justify tightening the screws
Suffice it to read the work of this Nikolai Starikov in the genre of paranoid pseudoscientific fiction: http://lit.md/nstarikov.htm
Here's an example:
Crisis. How it's done (2009)