Algorithm Optimisation Championship. - page 110
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So, what difference does it make what function? F(x1,x2,x3, ...xn). It only matters how many variables, and that for simplification, because a different software is needed for an arbitrary number. If analytical, that alone is enough.
Here, the only thing is, when you combine all this - this FF(x...), somehow you have to first make sure that it has only one maximum). If I'm not mistaken, I don't think anyone asked that question. And then you have to look for several and choose the coolest one), and that's another task again.
People here confuse the notion of FF - (fitness function) which is a software function and an analytic function like fy = (x1 + x2 + ...xn);
The FF contains an analytical function and substitutes into it the values of parameters from the array received from AO. What exactly will be the analytical function I don't care, but the structure of FF library, FF itself, names of functions returning significant parameters, connection interface - all this is of paramount importance when creating an algorithm.
I have already thought out exactly how the algorithm will work. Now I need the library functionality to start building it.
Let him look "the best" in front of you.
Now I need the functionality of the library to start building it.
Let him look "the best" in front of you.
Well, by not including yourself among the most adequate people here, you've set yourself up. )
That the topicstarter may have "crowned" himself, that he cherished his GA, is his own business. However, by organising the championship he showed initiative, courage, persistence and a desire for objective self-assessment through competition with others. That in itself commands respect.
Mr. Zelinsky showed nothing but various trolling on this thread, but his merit is that it worked for those viewers, who like trolling, and the event became more crowded. All in all, objectivity aside, it must be admitted that Mr Zielinski has also helped to popularise the championship.
Personally, I liked how easily you handled the text, so I would like to see you among the participants.
P.S. As for the insults on the part of the topicstarter - trolling begets trolling.
I support him!
Dik put on a cord and bullshit on everyone, and specifically!
Like let me guess a number and you guess, if no, then you all suck and I am a king.
I know why he doesn't get banned - waiting for him to make a deal so he can get banned where he lives.
Dick, go ahead - rock out in your repertoire to my post.
I second that!
Dick's just putting on a cornea himself, and he's really pissing everybody off!
Like, let me guess the number and you guess, if not, you're all losers and I'm the king.
I know why he doesn't get banned - waiting for him to make a deal so he can get banned where he lives.
Dick, go ahead - rock out in your repertoire to my post.
- Let's do it! Why? (с)
P.S. As for the insults from the topicstarter - trolling begets trolling.
Yeah, the creator should always be three heads above trolling and the like.
Or am I wrong?
I'm sure you yourself are fed up with his innuendo, but you still hold firm and want to show that there are not only Pinocchios with their noses held high.
Well, by not including yourself among the most adequate people here, you've set yourself up. )
That the topicstarter may have "crowned" himself, that he cherished his GA, is his own business. However, by organising the championship he showed initiative, courage, persistence and a desire for objective self-assessment through competition with others. That in itself commands respect.
Mr Zielinski has shown nothing but varied trolling on this thread, but his merit is that it has worked for those spectators who like trolling, and the event has become more crowded. All in all, objectivity aside, it must be admitted that Mr Zielinski has also helped to popularise the championship.
Personally, I liked how easily you handled the text, so I would have liked to see you among the participants.
P.S. As for the insults on the part of the topicstarter - trolling begets trolling.
I can't "fit in" myself)).
That's not where you see trolling.
I second that!
Dick's just putting on a cornea himself, and he's really pissing everybody off!
Like, let me guess the number and you guess, if not, you're all suckers and I'm the king.
I know why he doesn't get banned - waiting for him to make a deal so he can get banned where he lives.
Dick, go ahead - rock your repertoire on my post.
Let me swing at your post.
What are you trying to do now? - Carry out a provocation?
In such a weak slangy, "like, dumb, suckers, pump..." blather?
Don't you have the imagination for a more subtle and intelligent provocation?
Take an example of trolling from Mr. Zelinsky. That's how you provoke...