FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2016 - page 532

New comment
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

hi - what is the indicator used ?

the one in the first picture

No
 
sxww:
No

I meant what kind of indicator - what is it called

 

On this basis, lines are drawn

 
sxww:

On this basis, lines are drawn

Oh, where is that from?

site - link calculation methodology ... etc

 
sxww:

If the selling levels are broken down, there's nothing to catch

And Guru is strong,sniper))))

it's called a scam posted post facto in boo. I was giving an 80 pips entry on the Canadian in advance - at the level.

And you're bouncing around like a fair with your rotten potatoes. (Yesterday I did not put the sell - it was too late - it was at ++).

And people, let them eat your post-facto, Adyu! (to all the honest company)

 
Tantrik:
sorry there's no ignore here ((((( , you punk-ass tu da da! (Look! can we really get the fuck out of here! ??????) ( and not remember the way back?)
Too bad, ignore is a thing
 
sxww:
So the funny thing is, they are looking for places to buy, no way to get that you don't have to do that.

It's possible to buy like that)

But I wouldn't risk it.

 
lactone:

It's possible to buy like that)

But I wouldn't risk it.

You don't risk it, you don't drink champagne. Levels are fine. 0.9 is bullshit.)
 
sterva:
He who does not take risks does not drink champagne. Levels are normal. 0.9 is bullshit.))

for today, yes...

we'll see during the week...

 
sterva:
He who does not take risks does not drink champagne. Levels are normal. 0.9 is bullshit.)

if we go below 1.05, that's where we'll be)

But at 1.21 - as Myth says, "owe."

1...525526527528529530531532533534535536537538539...1381
New comment