Are there any trading robots in our galaxy that make money instead of losing??????? - page 43
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Is this the kind of robot you want? I made it myself!
Or like this?
Or like this amazingly beautiful graph?
:=)
Is this the kind of robot you want? I made it myself!
Or like this?
Or like this amazingly beautiful graph?
:=)
Where's the beauty in it? This is beauty.)))
At most 4 orders in the market.Where's the beauty in that? This is beauty.)))
Max 4 orders in the market.It's not a martingale. Although some features are present. Can we call an algorithm that increases the lot by 5% a martin. Also you cannot call increasing the lot with increasing the deposit a mart. Here is a picture that confirms this. Initial stage is overclocking, then the lot does not increase. Profit for 2 years is more than 4000%. There is always one order in the market if you are interested. Haven't you got any bright eyes? :=)
One more picture for fun.
there's a lot of losing lots :=)
And one more for the podium,
Though not as pretty as yours, but good too!
My bot has gone like this for the last eight years, let's see what happens in the future.
My bot has gone like this for the last eight years, let's see what happens in the future.
not bad, but 8 years have already passed. and "we cannot predict" the future. The only thing I'd point out is that as your volume rises, so do your pullbacks. This may go beyond the marginal requirements. And most importantly, the 8 year history test makes little sense. The market has changed a lot during this time. Look at the form of the quotes chart on higher timeframes. The past 2 years are very different from the previous and probably next ones. In my opinion a forward and back test is needed in the near future.
The advantage of my EA (for me of course) is that I know exactly how it works and its weaknesses. But it is definitely not afraid of trend and flat, not afraid of news. It hides the algorithm from the broker. Almost a grail. But among many combinations of settings there are variants of losing. For example, when testing a parameter that may take values from 0 to 1 in increments of 0.05 there are a couple of variants that results in a margin call. You may get into trouble, because you do not know what variant will be in the future. There are two ways to fight it, for example, to divide the deposit into 20 accounts. But here the problem is the size of the pocket. My pocket is big ... :=). The second option is to set the drawdown protection. In principle, the Expert Advisor has the algorithm for withdrawing from a drawdown that leads the deposit to the previous level, the only thing is that it loses time for this. There is still plenty of work on testing and correcting algorithms of the third level, so the Forbes list is not threatening yet :=).
But do you need an answer to the galactic question? I was chatting with the coolest expert in EA creation. He said that any Expert Advisor lives a few months. Then the algorithm becomes obsolete. So, if someone is selling their EA, it's because its lifetime is coming to an end. Otherwise, why bother asking for pennies when you can make millions? Take a loan from the bank and blow it sky high.
not bad, but it's been 8 years. and "we can't predict" the future. The only thing I would point out is that as your volume grows, so do your kickbacks. This may go beyond the marginal requirements. And most importantly, the 8 year history test makes little sense. The market has changed a lot during this time. Look at the form of the quotes chart on higher timeframes. The past 2 years are very different from the previous and probably next ones. In my opinion a forward and back test is needed in the near future.
The advantage of my EA (for me of course) is that I know exactly how it works and its weaknesses. But it is definitely not afraid of trend and flat, not afraid of news. It hides the algorithm from the broker. Almost a grail. But among many combinations of settings there are variants of losing. For example, when testing a parameter that may take values from 0 to 1 in increments of 0.05 there are a couple of variants that results in a margin call. You may get into trouble, because we do not know what variant will be in the future. There are two ways to fight it, for example, to divide the deposit into 20 accounts. But here the problem is the size of the pocket. My pocket is big ... :=). The second option is to set the drawdown protection. In principle, the Expert Advisor has the algorithm for withdrawing from a drawdown that leads the deposit to the previous level, the only thing is that it loses time for this. There is still plenty of work on testing and correcting algorithms of the third level, so the Forbes list is not threatening yet :=).
But do you need an answer to the galactic question? I was chatting with the coolest expert in EA creation. He said that any Expert Advisor lives a few months. Then the algorithm becomes obsolete. So, if someone is selling their EA, it's because its lifetime is coming to an end. Otherwise, why bother asking for pennies when you can make millions? Take a loan from the bank and blow it sky high.
An adviser, to an adviser, is not the same. Don't generalise everything, and there are different reasons for selling it. And it is not customary to talk about credit here at all.
This is my first time here and I have never taken out a loan for anything and I wouldn't advise anyone.
I am not an expert in the field of trading at all. This is a recent hobby. My purpose of appearing here is to see if I am reinventing the wheel. My algorithms (of the first level) are non-syndicator in principle. The second group of algorithms, which I call "guess the tune" I don't recognize, because it's more art than science. You need special god-given abilities for that. I don't have them. Trying to guess the future in my opinion is the province of Baba Vanga. Or simpler - the market, again in my not very enlightenedview, has a deterministic and random component. The overwhelming number of mundane robot creators are looking for exactly the latter. But it is getting smaller and smaller.
This is my first time here and I have never taken out a loan for anything and I wouldn't advise anyone.
I am not an expert in the field of trading at all. This is a recent hobby. My purpose of appearing here is to see if I am reinventing the wheel. My algorithms (of the first level) are non-syndicator in principle. The second group of algorithms, which I call "guess the tune" I don't recognize, because it's more art than science. You need special god-given abilities for that. I don't have them. Trying to guess the future in my opinion is the province of Baba Vanga. Or simpler - the market, again in my not very enlightenedview, has a deterministic and random component. The overwhelming number of mundane robot creators are looking for exactly the latter. But it is getting smaller and smaller.
You're all trying to measure each other's testers, it's like a kindergarten)))
At least one would draw a real or demo report.
At least such a scary one (ran the code on the fly, changed settings, in general, made fun of the full):