Investing properly or preserving a capital of 1,000,000 USD - page 11
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And he doesn't even have a billion (I don't think he ever did). That is why he is already in the ass... By the way - sorry for him ...
Seriously, beginners think that they can become millionaires by trading Forex... and when they understand that the annual ROI of 40% - is very good, and if the annual ROI is 80% - is so good that you just think that this is manipulation a la backtest on the tester - illusions pass, and understanding comes that if, for example, there is $ 1 million, then after a year in the case of very successful profitable trading may be 1.400.000 ... and if you have 1,000 quid, in a year it could be 1,400,000 ...
That's a good point! Only newbies don't understand it. They need 80% every day -)))
I think that luck is as effective as violence, robbery and exploitation. Therefore, I fully agree that luck also rules.
As for robbery and violence, there are many examples where these things have worked most wonderfully. Look at the history of State #1: America's entire prosperity was built on African slaves, on Indian lands taken away and then at the expense of the rest of the world (remember US foreign debt and dollar hegemony).
You just don't have to explain your lack of money to yourself by the fact that you are an honest person and not prone to violence, robbery and exploitation.
I know many who made like rock stars in the 90's and reached the coveted figure indicated in the topical absolutely legally.
I know this for a fact because I worked alongside them. Then the luck ran out. They kept doing what they had always done, but the result was only negative.
Luck and luck is the only thing that rules!
...
Luck and fortune is the only thing that rules!
I agree with the statements about violence, robbery, exploitation and luck, this is the only way a kid can come to success and it doesn't matter how old you are in your 20s or 60s, by about 10-15 years of age a basic social attitude is formed, who will be in life, a predator or a victim, forever young or an old man from the start. So one thing can be said, the former have a more interesting life, although statistically much shorter. It's like the analogy with stars, massive stars evolve much faster and more dramatically than red dwarfs.
Violence, robbery, exploitation and farthing are in a mathematical sense similar to variance, the more active a person is and the more capable they are of taking risks, the more likely they are to rise. This probability is not for some hidden reasons, but only because the sucker has no chance of success (lifelong financial independence), because the fork of his activity is extremely narrow, while the one who is not afraid of risk has a chance and statistically this probability is realized in someone (good luck), although most will have a negative adventure and will disappear, but it will be a volatile adventure, and not a chronic sucking as in the victims.
It can be compared with the ratio of profitability of practically any activity, in big cities / capitals and villages / provinces, all other things being equal. In the countryside, for example, there is simply no use for many types of activities and social attitudes that inhibit a person to "escape", it is necessary to go where his work will be paid more. "Get out" can not only be territorial but also a more fundamental way, realizing the facts that you live only once and will die anyway, as it was not, so it is hardly worth much bother all the moral and ethical nonsense and take from life the maximum, by active action and a high but competent risk.
PS. Those who really trade, know that the manager who leaks for example a hundred green a day of client money at P\L~ 2, a yield of 30% per year and capital of 20 mio $, there is nothing more awful than a couple of questions about how it happened, But a jackass who makes so much money in one lifetime (100k$), if he somehow loses it in one day (for example, borrowed and cheated), for sure he will disappear, they won't even try to motivate him (by violence), it makes no sense. So it is not clear who is more at risk.
I agree with the statements about violence, robbery, exploitation and luck, this is the only way a kid can come to success and it doesn't matter how old you are in your 20s or 60s, by about 10-15 years of age a basic social attitude is formed, who will be in life, a predator or a victim, forever young or an old man from the start. So one thing can be said, the former have a more interesting life, although statistically much shorter. It's like the analogy with stars, massive stars evolve much faster and more dramatically than red dwarfs.
Violence, robbery, exploitation and farthing are in a mathematical sense similar to variance, the more active a person is and the more capable they are of taking risks, the more likely they are to rise. This probability is not for some hidden reasons, but only because the sucker has no chance of success (lifelong financial independence), because the fork of his activity is extremely narrow, while the one who is not afraid of risk has a chance and statistically this probability is realized in someone (good luck), although most will have a negative adventure and will disappear, but it will be a volatile adventure, and not a chronic sucking as in the victims.
It can be compared with the ratio of profitability of practically any activity, in big cities / capitals and villages / provinces, all other things being equal. In the countryside, for example, there is simply no use for many types of activities and social attitudes that inhibit a person to "escape", it is necessary to go where his work will be paid more. "Get out" can not only territorially but also in a more fundamental way, realizing the facts that you live only once and will die anyway, as it was not, so it is hardly worth much bother all the moral and ethical nonsense and take the maximum from life, the active actions and the high but competent risk.
PS. Those who really trade, know that the manager who leaks for example a hundred green a day of client money at P\L~ 2, a yield of 30% per year and capital of 20 mio $, there is nothing more awful than a couple of questions about how it happened, But a jackass who makes so much money in one lifetime (100k$), if he somehow loses it in one day (for example, borrowed and cheated), for sure he will disappear, they won't even try to motivate him (by violence), it makes no sense. So it is not clear who is more at risk.
Somehow you've combined violence, robbery and exploitation with the ability to take intelligent (aggressive but calculating) risks and, as a consequence, be friends with fortune.
This is a personal quirk of yours. The latter does not automatically imply the former. The latter and the former may well exist together or separately.
About a million. It is wise to invest in various hedge funds specialising in algorithmic trading.
Invest in UT, if they haven't already closed their hedge fund for investment.
Plus, there are a couple of other companies that MAY still be accepting money, you have to look into it.
I like this one the best:
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Investing well or saving 1 000 000 USD
farsec, 2013.11.14 07:58
I have been investing for 9 years
1 Real estateinvestment 60%
2 Bank deposit 10%
3Precious metals accounts 30%
You can just do real estate and not give a shit. That is, to buy and put it up for sale at a higher price, or to rent it out.
I wish I had a million. ))