Voluntary certification of programmers in the Work service - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In fact, many clients find it difficult to reveal their secrets, even to a single performer,
But necessity forces them to, and making their idea available to the team is out of the question.
I would not work with such customers if I was a programmer, they are strange people, as if they do not know the proverb of apples....
Although ... You'll be out of a job...:-)
This problem is not specific only here, having said it in a lofty way - it is a problem of society in general, :-), A lot of people are sick of mystery.... and not just about TC... well.... Somehow we have to live until the era of universal prosperity comes :-)
I understand the problem, but I'm not sick of it, and I wish everyone the same...
Yes yes . And for customers to introduce a coefficient of greed. When the request is less than $ 25, coefficient = 0.
Why not an option?
Only a diversification of such a rule is needed and towards performers..... - The higher the average cost of the orders - the lower the rating :-)
You can also sum up the total value of orders placed and completed
Why not an option?
Only a diversification of such a rule is needed and towards performers..... - The higher the average cost of the orders - the lower the rating :-)
You can also sum up the total value of orders placed and fulfilled
Although counting other people's money is a sign of bad form, but a more correct rating would be how much money the programmer has earned over a year.
The programmer can be a highly skilled professional who takes only expensive orders, or may be a generic programmer who makes a lot of orders on standard templates for a minimum price(which does not make him a bad specialist). Both of them are needed on the market. And you can assess their rating by the total value of the work done in a period.
It is the customer's pipe dream to describe the order in such a way that everything works as it should, but without revealing the idea.
I mean some customers..... :-)
Well - that's how they get it - "everything works, but you don't know how."
We're all magicians, just not everyone realises it, coming to a place of our own volition.
Irresponsibility is also at the top of our social life.
It is the customer's pipe dream to describe the order in such a way that everything works as it should, but without revealing the idea.
A programmer can be a high-end specialist who only takes expensive orders, or he can be a template programmer who makes many orders on standard templates for a minimum price(which does not make him a bad specialist). Both of them are needed on the market. And you can assess their rating by the total value of the work done for the period.
I have a letter - to order modules and then assemble them myself in MQL5 Wizard.
:-) not.... i don't need such a middleman, it encourages mystery, though... as an option.... i suggest a promising direction for programmers, make popular modules for the wizard and sell them on the market - mystery lovers will buy them.... and competition will appear.... the module of placing orders by "THEY" may be better than a similar module by "THE OTHER" - the widest field for display of professionalism
Then rumours will spread all over the net, "Whose module are you using? You sucker, the module is 0.0000001 sec faster than yours :-)
The cost of the idea to my account login. :-) Well, that's when your conscience comes around - or - nobility...
I promise to put in a good word for you at the terrible court later.... :-)
And if you divide this amount by the number of periods - you can estimate the activity of the programmer..... and the customer too, if you divide his amount of costs...
Quite, by the way everything is on a personal agreement, but usually the more often the customer applies the cheaper the job comes out.
A normal phenomenon! Once you get to know each other, you get to know each other from half a word.... :-)
By the way - this factor can be expressed not in absolute values but in relative terms, and the coefficient will only know the organizers, a beginner would not understand and will focus simply on the value, and the "advanced users", will be able to roughly think out the "cost" of a performer or customer numbers from their ratings and knowing the amount of their turnover
And what's the problem? Does teamwork scare you? Well, you have problems, and probably not only here but also in everyday life....
your problems are verbiage. It's none of your business what I have or how
Well, here's another one with a "Y" and a complaint.... Of course I am pleased to be addressed as Y, but when I meet a stranger I must first find out if we can use Y to talk to him or her. Would he or she be comfortable?
The topic will be exhausted only when doubts disappear and no questions remain - then the topic will die by itself, or am I the only one who stood out and sinned offtop again?
Don't play the girl, you're on the internet, people talk to the president on the internet **** and he's playing around...
you're the one who's most offensive. The customer's reasoning about how programmers work with each other is just so annoying...