Discussing the article: "Role of random number generator quality in the efficiency of optimization algorithms" - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There are real GSCs, based on quantum effects.
You can call them anything you like, the properties of oscillators will not change from this. It is important to understand that software oscillators are not truly random, they are abbreviated as GSCs.
There are no restrictions. Everything is automated.
Which algorithm? I don't quite understand what high compilation speed means, does it mean that there is nothing for the compiler to cut or vice versa?
ZY Ah, got it, all mqh together.
This is great. I will move them to the archive in the codebase. Then it will always be possible to refer to one source.
I think this is the best solution, thanks.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Discussion of the article "The role of random number generator quality in the efficiency of optimisation algorithms"
fxsaber, 2024.03.25 15:19
The sources are very different.
And here they made changes relatively recently.
MACROS_AO(ABC) // #include <..\Scripts\#AO Articles\#4 The world of AO - Artificial Bee Colony (ABC)\AO_ABC.mqh>Check out these two algorithms (taken from different articles) from the archive.
The sources are very different.
And here changes were made relatively recently.
Yes, of course, I make changes, improvements. So a codebase would be a great solution.
Still, please tell me, I'm very curious, what does relatively high speed of source compilation mean? Is there anything I should pay attention to specifically?
In some places I deliberately added too much code, which I think the compiler can easily cut out. This is done to increase readability and better understand the logic of algorithms (for me, first of all). ;))) I hope it helps readers to better understand the logic of the search strategies too.
Still, please tell me, I'm very curious, what does relatively high speed of source compilation mean? Maybe there is something I should pay attention to specifically?
Immediately gave the link in the post.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Discussion of the article "The role of random number generator quality in the efficiency of optimisation algorithms"
fxsaber, 2024.03.25 16:09
The mqh is 883 Kb, and compiles quite fast - 14 MACD.
Immediately gave the link in the post.
Yes, I have seen posts with measurements regarding MACD. But I don't understand, what does high speed of code compilation mean? Does it mean good, bad, unoptimised code?
Yes, I have seen posts with measurements regarding MACD. But I don't understand, what does high speed of code compilation mean? Does it mean the code is good, bad, unoptimised?
That's why I asked the question.
Took a simple trading owl for this. It is better, of course, for FF something more interesting in trading.