AI 2023. Meet ChatGPT. - page 40
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The condition says that the bottle is more expensive than the cork by 10 roubles, not 10.5.
If the cork costs 0.5, then 0.5 + 10 = 10.5
The condition says that the boy paid 11 rubles.
So, 0.5 roubles is a state tax.))))
A bottle without a cork is 10.5 and the cork is 0.5
The condition says that the bottle is more expensive than the cork by 10 roubles, not 10.5.
If the cork costs 0.5, then 0.5 + 10 = 10.5
The condition says that the boy paid 11 rubles.
So, 0.5 roubles is a state tax.))))
the difference is 10 roubles.
the total cost is 11 rubles.
you mistakenly subtract the difference of 10 rubles not from the cost of the bottle but from the total cost, this is not correct.
Your answer is 1 ruble?
How much is the bottle then? 11-1=10?
then the difference is not equal to 10: 10-1=9!!!!
))
make an equation and solve it.
No, one cork costs 0.5 roubles and this answer is correct. Let's calculate. A cork costs 0.5 roubles. The bottle costs ten roubles more, i.e. its cost is 0.5 + 10 = 10.5 roubles. Add up 0.5 + 10.5 = 11 rubles.
With respect, Vladimir.
I agree. )))
Bottle without cork - 10.5 and cork 0.5.
Yes, that's right.)))) Domestic thinking fails us.))
Asked the same question with the boy and the bottle, got the same answer. Then I asked:
"the boy sold the cork, how much money did he get?".
AI answer:
Unfortunately, we do not have enough information to answer this question. We know that the boy paid 11 rubles for the bottle with the cork, and we calculated that the cork itself cost 0.5 rubles. However, we do not know how much the boy sold the cork for, so we cannot determine how much money he received for it.
If we knew the selling price of the cork, we could subtract the cost of the cork from the selling price to determine the boy's profit or loss from the sale. However, without this information, we cannot make any calculations.
Peter, since AI is inextricably linked to electronics, ask him this question:
On a chip board, there are conductive copper tracks that connect the inputs and outputs of the chips. One of the outputs of a K155LA3 series chip has a logic one. This output is connected via a conductive copper track to one of the inputs of another chip K155LN1. Why can this input of the K155LN1 chip be a "half" and not a logical one?
I'll say at once that any electronic engineer will answer this question straight away.
Regards, Vladimir.
Continuation of the same discussion:
what is the most logical price for the cork the boy sold?
...
It is difficult to determine the most logical price for the cork that the boy sold without any additional information. However, we can make some reasonable assumptions based on the context of the problem.
Since the boy originally paid 11 rubles for the bottle and the cork, we know that the bottle itself costs at least 10.5 rubles (11 rubles - 0.5 rubles for the cork). If we assume that the bottle is of standard size and its price is approximately the same as other similar bottles, we can assume that the bottle is worth more than the c ork. Therefore, if the boy sold only the cork, it is likely that he received a relatively small amount of money for it. He may have sold it for a little more than its cost price (0.5 roubles), but it is unlikely to be much more.
Based on these assumptions, a reasonable guess as to the most logical price at which the boy sold the cork would be between 0.5 roubles and 1 rouble. However, this is only an assumption based on the limited information we have, and the actual price at which the boy sold the cork may be higher or lower.
Peter, since AI is inextricably linked to electronics, ask it this question:
On a chip board, there are conductive copper tracks that connect the inputs and outputs of the chips. One of the outputs of a K155LA3 series chip has a logic one. This output is connected via a conductive copper track to one of the inputs of another chip K155LN1. Why can this input of the K155LN1 microcircuit have a "half" but not a logical one?
Let me say at once that any electronic engineer will answer this question straight away.
Regards, Vladimir.
AI answer:
...
Without more information about the specific details of the circuit and the nature of the signals being transmitted, it is difficult to give a definitive answer. In general, however, the input signal behaviour of a chip depends on the circuit design and the electrical properties of the components used.
In many cases, the chip input is designed to be sensitive to certain voltage levels or signal characteristics. If the input receives a signal that falls within a certain range or meets certain conditions, the chip interprets the signal as a logic "1" or "high" value. If the input receives a signal thatfallsoutside this range or does not meet the required conditions, the chip interprets the signal as a logic "0" or "low" value.
In some cases, the chip input may be designed to be "floating" or high impedance, meaning that the input does not have a well-defined logic level until a signal is applied to it. This may occur when the chip input is not connected to a signal source or when the signal source is not actively affecting the input. In this case, the input may be in a state that is neither a logic "1" nor a logic "0" but is somewhere in between, often referred to as a "high Z" state.
It is possible that the input of the K155LN1 chip is designed toremainin the high-Z state until it receives a signal from the output of the K155LA3 chip. In this case, the conductive copper track connecting the two chips will act as a signal path, allowing the output of the K155LA3 chip to drive the input of the K155LN1 chip in the presence of a signal. In the absence of a signal, the input of the K155LN1 chip may remain in the high-Z state.
In general, the behaviour of the chip input signal depends on the particular device and circuit operation. It is important to consider the characteristics of the components and the signal paths involved to understand why a particular input may or may not receive a logic one signal.
Without more information about the specific details of the circuit and the nature of the signals being transmitted, it is difficult to give a definitive answer. In general, however, the input signal behaviour of a chip depends on the circuit design and the electrical properties of the components used.
In many cases, the chip input is designed to be sensitive to certain voltage levels or signal characteristics. If the input receives a signal that falls within a certain range or meets certain conditions, the chip interprets the signal as a logic "1" or "high" value. If the input receives a signal that falls outside this range or does not meet the required conditions, the chip interprets the signal as a logic "0" or "low" value.
In some cases, the chip input may be made "floating" or high impedance, meaning that the input does not have a well-defined logic level until a signal is applied to it. This may occur when the chip input is not connected to a signal source or when the signal source is not actively affecting the input. In this case, the input may be in a state that is neither a logic "1" nor a logic "0" but somewhere in between, often referred to as a "high Z" state.
It is possible that the input of the K155LN1 chip is designed toremainin the high-Z state until it receives a signal from the output of the K155LA3 chip. In this case, the conductive copper track connecting the two chips will act as a signal path, allowing the output of the K155LA3 chip to drive the input of the K155LN1 chip when a signal is present. In the absence of a signal, the input of the K155LN1 chip may remain in the high-Z state.
In general, the behaviour of the chip input signal depends on the particular device and circuit operation. It is important to consider the characteristics of the components and the signal paths involved to understand why a particular input may or may not receive a logic one signal.
Very close to the truth, but the more correct answer is - because the conductive track was broken.
Regards, Vladimir.
"Two people were walking along a river. They both needed to cross the river. They found a boat on the bank. Only one person can be in the boat. The people cannot swim, only use the boat. How can they get to the other side of the river?"
And in general, there are a lot of children's tasks for ingenuity, I'm sure almost 100%, chat will not be able to solve them.It's not a "thinking inertia problem", it's a "problem with a wrong condition". What is surprising that the answer to such a task can be anything?
In particular - the given answer is categorically wrong, because both people were on ONE side of the river (because the opposite side is not specified). And person B could not have got into the boat when person A crossed to the other side.