You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
One quick answer might be this:
It is clear to trade in the channel.
What is not clear is the reason for losing the profit.
Trading in a channel is clear.
Not clear: Why break a profit.
Trading in a channel is clear.
I do not understand: Why should I catch a profit?
You need a super-planned profit to cover unexpected losses, so that the balance line would be flat and move beautifully... because "1200 subscribers" means that risky trading is not a risky business.
One of the quick answers could be this:
But it won't make the difference, if we trade this same breakout with a fixed profit from previous trades.
Or if we draw within a range to return - also the difference will not bewith a fixed profit from previous trad es.
For example, balance=100, lock=50, current profit=10, amount=160,
the same without the lock: balance=150,current profit=10, amount=160,
what is the point of using the lock?
But there will be no difference, if we trade the same breakdown with fixed profit from previous trades.
Or, if you build a range on a return, there will also be no differencewith a fixed profit from previous trades.
For example, balance=100, lock=50, current profit=10, amount=160,
the same without the lock: balance=150,current profit=10, amount=160,
what is the point of using the lock?
The super-planned profits are taken to cover unexpected losses and the balance line will be smooth and move beautifully... because "1200 subscribers" interrupt risky trading in a risk-free business...
It is unlikely - because subscribers are already counting on future profits - and disappointment is unavoidable, and if crisis happens, the reserve is no good there, it depends on the aggressiveness of course ...
It is unlikely - because subscribers are already counting on future profits - and disappointment cannot be avoided, and if a crisis happens, the reserve will not help, of course it depends on the aggressiveness...
If $50 is gained into a positive lock, then the current profit is $50. Minus swaps for holding that lock. Such a lock dissolves over time, which means that the position needs to be managed so as not to overpay the swap above $50.
I misspelled a bit, implying that this is the current profit from positions outside the loc,
there is no difference between 60 and 50+10,
there is no difference between 100+50+10 and 150+10
It doesn't depend on that, it depends on the fact that the provider manages the risk of his account, while the subscriber just deposits funds and that's it.
Well, all this is also invariant with and without lock.