Grail, trading systems, martingale, netting, pyramiding. Let's share our experiences and move towards our goal! - page 21
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
They have such an interest rate there that it's easier to put it in the bank)
Well, firstly, the interest rate at the bank is lower. Secondly, leverage of 1:20 and above is only in fairy tales....
Well, firstly, the interest rate at the bank is lower. Secondly, leverage of 1:20 and above only happens in fairy tales....
See, you had to search. And algotraders do not need to search, they have known it for a long time).
I was looking for you, not for myself) I thought you were accusing scientists because you don't know how to search the internet)
Deposit in any shiat currency, plus hedge exchange rate risk with futures (if any).
Well, hedge fund employees don't know it's that simple! They don't read this forum - savages, what....
Well, hedge fund employees don't know it's that simple! They don't read this forum - savages, what....
I'd say it's the other way around) in the field of algotrading, scientists are forever behind the practitioners)
Scientists (like traders) come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes scientists are quite successful traders. A famous example is Simons of the Renaissance Foundation.
Historically, the first example of successful speculation is associated with the philosopher Thales)
What's the strategy?
Still, please clarify, will you write and publish a proper, sensible article about gaps in the "Articles" section of this forum? Or would you rather look like a blabbermouth like your shaggy-haired compatriot?
PS. Nothing against your criticism of me or anyone else. Just suggesting that you supplement it with constructive criticism. Criticism without further constructive criticism is blabbermouthery.
Still, please clarify, will you write and publish a proper, sensible article about gaps in the "Articles" section of this forum? Or would you prefer to look like a blabbermouth like your shaggy-haired compatriot?
+++
the result will be a bit predictable 😁