Lagging OI (open interest) - page 4

 
Alena Lysenkova:

To clarify. The OI in the terminal changes by itself, without ticks and without events in the ribbon/stack.

How is this?
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

It seems they don't have mt5 for real forts at all, they offer quik

Which broker has it?

Openers can have mt5 without any money

 
Nikita Chernyshov:

The opener can have an mt5 with no money

ok. thank you!

 
Vasiliy Sokolov:
How is this?

The OI changes out of sync with the trade feed (in MT5).

 

Ooh, I remembered, apparently this customer approached me around New Year's Eve saying another contractor couldn't handle it, but I didn't have time for him)

The topic is interesting and exciting as always. The trader just usual without a reason just hit and pooped on someone, and it turned out he had shit all over himself))))

 
prostotrader:

The OI does not change in sync with the trade feed (in MT5).

Examples of indicators, at least approximate coincidence?
Or what is the reason, as it should coincide
If not here, please write an answer in private, please
 
Aleksey Mavrin:

Ooh, I remembered, apparently this customer approached me around New Year's Eve saying another contractor couldn't handle it, but I couldn't deal with it).

The topic is interesting and exciting as always. I have not heard the rumors, but I have not heard anything.)

You hear the bell, but you don't know where it is.

"Ridiculing" to the posted code.

1. If the OM was synchronous, we would need to obtain it with the arrival of the deal in the feed.

2) Since OI in the terminal is not synchronous, we don't care whether we receive it by timer or by window change.

This is a technical forum and the code is subject to discussion.

How can we talk about results if the code is badly written?

And if the ticks are not copied?

CopyTicks(_Symbol,tick,COPY_TICKS_ALL,0,1);

There are 20 ticks here at all!

int ticks = CopyTicks(_Symbol,tick,COPY_TICKS_ALL,0,100);
   if(ticks<20) return;

There should be a check for a symbol.

void OnBookEvent (const string& symbol)

The TC's answer that the code was written "by hand" is worthless.

How do forum members know the qualifications of the implementer and how the code was written?

Added

And there is nothing interesting and exciting about this topic if one has an understanding of FORTS.

Very many "writers" of Expert Advisors, grab a job for the MICEX without even knowing many of the basics of trading on the Stock and Derivatives market!

 
prostotrader:

You hear a bell, you don't know where it is.

"Hitting" on the posted code.

1. If the OI was synchronous, it would have to be received with the arrival of the deal in the feed.

2) Since OI in the terminal is not synchronous, we don't care whether we receive it by timer or by window change.

This is a technical forum and the code is subject to discussion.

How can we talk about results if the code is badly written?

And if the ticks are not copied?

There are 20 ticks here at all!

There should be a check for a symbol.

The TC's answer that the code was written "by hand" is worthless.

How do forum members know the qualifications of the implementer and how the code was written?

Added

And there is nothing interesting and exciting about this topic if one has an understanding of FORTS.

Very many "writers" of Expert Advisors, grab a job for MICEX without even knowing many of the basics of trading on the Stock Market!

I understood that from the first page the code is under discussion.

I don't understand why 20 ticks are copied.

I'm going to have to write it myself.
 
prostotrader:

You hear a bell, you don't know where it is.

"Hitting" on the posted code.

1. If the OI was synchronous, it would have to be received with the arrival of the deal in the feed.

2) Since OI in the terminal is not synchronous, we don't care whether we receive it by timer or by window change.

This is a technical forum and the code is subject to discussion.

How can we talk about results if the code is badly written?

And if the ticks are not copied?

There are 20 ticks here at all!

There should be a check for a symbol.

The TC's answer that the code was written "by hand" is worthless.

How do forum members know the qualifications of the implementer and how the code was written?

Added

And there is nothing interesting and exciting about this topic if one has an understanding of FORTS.

If you do not know the basics of trading on the Stock and Derivatives Market, then you cannot be sure of the correctness of the code!

No customers - no experts, no experts - no customers. It is a vicious circle.

I communicate with many algotraders. I`m not aware of anyone except you and myself ;) I`ve trade in MT5 with verified results :)

I currently have two tasks that I am unable to solve as a programmer. So? Where should I go? Freelancing? No one there even remotely understands the problems I need to solve.

 
Dmi3:

No customers, no specialists; no specialists, no customers. It's a vicious circle.

I communicate with a lot of algotraders. I am not aware of any other one, who is trading in MT5 with verified results :)

I currently have two tasks that I am unable to solve as a programmer. So? Where should I go? Freelancing? Nobody there even remotely understands the problems that I have to solve.

I mean, what problems?

there's enough information and examples here to figure it out and write it yourself