![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You forgot about the very high power of random sampling due to high parallelism. Many different planets with different conditions, and there are very many random processes going on at the same time on each of them.
Self-reproduction is an incredibly complex and incomprehensible thing that no one has yet artificially replicated. FF is the debugging criterion for pattern reproduction. No system, no FF. That is, the FF is secondary to the system.
Stubbornly stable systems have learned to self-reproduce and use FF as a method of self-debugging... All together this is Evolution, or in our simplified sense, GA.
Dialectics is unscientific and unphilosophical nonsense, whether Hegelian or Marxist.
Read better about the principle of least action, at least.
As soon as you write a scientific refutation of Hegel's "Science of Logic" (which, by the way, was commented and parsed by the Soviet Academy of Sciences, publishing an entire book), I will certainly study it.
Self-reproduction is an incredibly complex and obscure thing that no one has yet artificially replicated. The FF is the debugging criterion for pattern reproduction. No system, no FF. That is, the FF is secondary to the system.
Stubbornly stable systems have learned to self-reproduce and use FF as a method of self-debugging... All together this is Evolution, and in our simplistic understanding, GA.
Just the opposite, FF can and has always existed before the system came into existence. The system (whatever it is, living organism or trading system) emerges from the presence of FF. The universe didn't exist yet, but there was already a FF, it's constants, Planck and others, or Divine Intent, whichever you prefer.
FF sets the direction of the results of randomness. I.e., the main consistency in the Götzschprung-Russell diagram is there just because of the presence of FF - those constants, without these constants the size and mass of stars would obey a normal distribution, but it is not so. If it were not for these constants, FF, fusion would take place without giving off heat, and thus planets would not bask in the caressing rays of their parent stars, the origin of life would be out of the question. Of course, there is the possibility of solid, rocky life forms, but the probability is negligible even in the presence of the FF, and certainly not without it.
As soon as you write a scientific refutation of Hegel's "Science of Logic" (which, by the way, was commented and parsed by the Soviet Academy of Sciences, producing an entire book), I will certainly study it.
Is it that wonderful "logic" with which he "proved" that the number of planets in the solar system must equal seven (shortly before the discovery of the eighth)?
Scholars comment on and take apart a lot of things. For example, the texts of Herodotus where centaurs and men with dog-heads were described.
If you want to understand logic, read Aristotle's Organon.By the way, all religions have random as "free will" and "God's will" is called FF.
Oops, that makes me feel uncomfortable...))
On the contrary, the FF can and has always existed before the emergence of the system. The system (whatever it is, living organism or trading system) emerges from the presence of the FF. The universe didn't exist yet, but there was already a FF, it's constants, Planck and others, or Divine Intent, whichever you prefer.
FF sets the direction of the results of randomness. I.e., the main consistency in the Götzschprung-Russell diagram is there just because of the presence of FF - those constants, without these constants the size and mass of stars would obey a normal distribution, but it is not so. If it were not for these constants, FF, fusion would take place without giving off heat, and thus planets would not bask in the caressing rays of their parent stars, the origin of life would be out of the question. Of course, there is the possibility of solid, rocky life forms, but the likelihood of them is negligible even in the presence of the FF, and certainly not without it.
If you replace the term FF with "Idea", everything falls into place. An idea tends to unfold and improve during implementation. In that case - the FF from GA should be flexible and transform, redirect and complicate as the result is found. This would result in a stable development of the system.
By the way, all religions have random as "free will" and "God's will" is called FF.
Oops, that makes me feel uncomfortable...))
Careful with that.)))
If you replace the term FF with "Idea", everything falls into place. An idea tends to unfold and evolve as it is implemented. If this is the case, then the FF from the GA should be flexible and transform, redirect and grow in complexity as the result is found. We will have a stable development of the system.
The FF is not and should not be part of the GA or any other AO. Should the meta-quotes change their optimizer for each user strategy??? )))) - of course not, we just need to prescribe FF as an optimization criterion to the user himself.
But calling FF an idea, yes, can be called an idea. Replace FF in my posts with the word "idea" and the meaning remains the same.