The market and the problems of choosing advisers

 

I suggest improving the description of EAs on Maquette by including a link to the EA's signal on a real account in the "General" tab.

If you add a filter for viewing EAs by setting the "Signal Availability" parameter, you can select EAs with published signals.

It remains to think how to protect yourself against false signals, which are actually generated by another Expert Advisor.

Документация по MQL5: Константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете
Документация по MQL5: Константы, перечисления и структуры / Состояние окружения / Информация о счете
  • www.mql5.com
, то позиции по каждому символу разрешается закрывать только в том порядке, в котором они были открыты — сначала самую старую, затем более новую и т.д. При попытке закрыть позиции в ином порядке будет получена ошибка. Уровень залоговых средств, при достижении которого происходит принудительное закрытие самой убыточной позиции (Stop Out...
 
Aleksander Gladkov:

I suggest improving the description of EAs by including a link to the EA's signal on a real account in the "General" tab.

If you add a filter for viewing EAs by setting the "Signal Availability" parameter, you can select EAs with published signals.

You need to think about how to protect yourself from false signals that are actually generated by another EA.

It is rather impossible. It will make it difficult to buy an EA for the sake of selling the signal from it. It will show the presence of competitors and create additional publicity for the author's signal

 

This topic has already been brought up a number of times. The proposal itself is good, but it all breaks down when you think through the nuances.

The very first stone: there are no EAs in the Market that show uninterrupted profitable performance over any sane historical period (a year or more). As a result, we will get the antipromotion of Expert Advisors.

The second stone: you can check the correspondence of the signal and the Expert Advisor only by controlling them in the Market Administration. That is, only they must have access to the signal. The question is: Do they need it? If the control over the signal is given to the seller, it is impossible to control it for 100%.

The third stone: if the seller has such a miracle expert, he should immediately open the signal, PAMM, etc. Why sell an expert?

 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

it's rather not possible. It would make it difficult to buy an EA for the sake of selling a signal from it. It will show the presence of non-competitors and create additional publicity for the author's signal

It will probably make it harder to sell EAs, which can only show their merits in words.

But it will make it easier for buyers who want to find an EA that actually trades.

 

Robomarket has already become such a dump, with 99% of products not working, that only a miracle will save it.

And most likely nothing will save it, just like Metakvots itself and the Metatrader platform.

In 10 years' time we will be laughing and laughing that we used to trade on it.

 
Konstantin Zharitov:

Robomarket has already become such a dump, with 99% of products not working, that only a miracle will save it.

And most likely nothing will save it, just like Metakvots itself and the Metatrader platform.

In 10 years' time we will be laughing and laughing that we used to trade on it.

And what will they trade on? A COMPUTER?
 
Konstantin Zharitov:

Robomarket has already become such a dump, with 99% of products not working, that only a miracle will save it.

And most likely nothing will save it, just like Metakvots itself and the Metatrader platform.

In 10 years' time we will be laughing and laughing that we used to trade on it.

Describe what "non-functional" marketplace products mean.
 
Artyom Trishkin:
Describe what is meant by "non-functional" marketplace products.

Which means.

Out of 100 Expert Advisors, 99 are plummers and tester gilts, 1 is more or less, and that's a long shot.


Vladimir Baskakov:
What will they trade on? EMTS?

Now almost every exchange and many brokers have their terminals that are more convenient, easier and pleasant to use than Metatrader, plus they are constantly improving and having fixed bugs.

It's a local story now, but it's only a matter of time before a new comprehensive platform appears, where everyone will happily pile in.

 
Evgeniy Zhdan:

You may begin.

You don't seem to have understood the message at all.

 
Konstantin Zharitov:

You don't seem to have understood the message at all.

At the moment, if a brokerage company does not have MT4 or MT5, they are running from it, not the other way around. Even, I would say that MT4 is more in demand, because the huge selection of EAs/indicators on the internet is free.

Your statement about the "new comprehensive platform" is laughable. Is metatrader by any chance a new platform?

Your message makes you look like a very ignorant person.

 
Konstantin Zharitov:

Which means.

Out of 100 Expert Advisors, 99 are plummers and tester grads, 1 is more or less, and that's a big stretch.


Now almost every exchange and many brokers have their own terminals, which are more convenient, easier and pleasant to use than Metatrader, plus they are constantly improving, bugs are being fixed.

Right now it's a local story, but it's only a matter of time before there is a new comprehensive platform where everyone will happily pile in.

I see. You don't know what an EA, an indicator or a script means, that they work according to their program and must execute the algorithm without error. But you have managed to call all the programs not working. And in the process, you threw it on the fan. It is you who don't know how to use applied tools. Perhaps you believe in Father Christmas...