Need your advice on which signal to choose for subscription. - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Hear hear, thank you!
We have a great censor - a filter that is designed to maximise our profits, our subscribers' profits, and not just 'count on it'.
About the stops: hidden or not? Why? We will take this into account and introduce it.
And what will be the frequency of deals, etc. - The statistics will show it, and the filter already helps us with this. We are not interested in such nuances, we want payoff for our subscription. In terms of combining strategies, it makes sense to use different signals and different "amplitude".
But most importantly, we are slowly learning to count ;)
Stops any (except limit orders) slips all, if trades in the market are traded. If the strategy is scalper (arbitrage, impulse trading, or other), then stops are put close to the entry price, and sometimes it slips and sometimes it expands the spread. When all transactions last more than 10 min and stops with profit are at a normal distance from the entry price, then slippage practically does not affect anything
Hear hear, thank you!
We have a great censor - a filter that is designed to maximise our profits, our subscribers' profits, and not just 'count on it'.
About the stops: hidden or not? Why? We will take this into account and introduce it.
And what will be the frequency of deals, etc. - The statistics will show it, and the filter already helps us with this. We are not interested in such nuances, we want payoff for our subscription. In terms of combining strategies, it makes sense to use different signals and different "amplitude".
But most importantly, we are slowly learning to count ;)
Let me tell you something else to pay attention to. Almost everyone who sells signals behaves unethically. Take for example a depot of 1000 dollars, he trades good, his profit is going down and then the drawdown has spread, the signalist deposits the depot, spends too much time and returns to zero or boom. I think that this is the best way to make a profit, but I do not know how to do it.
Stops are all (except limit orders) slips, if transactions are traded on the market. If the strategy is scalper (arbitrage, impulse trading or other), stops are put close to the entry price and sometimes slips and slippage affects something.
Yes, we would like to take prices and results from the market - that's a good point))))
Overall, I see you have experience).
We had an idea(#81), about the average monthly profit, from one of the participants, what do you think, is it all right, maybe something should be added / removed before making this point?
Let me tell you something else to look out for... Almost everyone who sells signals behaves unethically. For example, the depo is $1000 and he trades all the way to the top and then the drawdown starts, the signaler refills the depo and spends too much time, so he returns to zero or boom. I have no idea what to do with this, all trades are the same, I got the loss, and the Provider has poured in his depo.
Thanks#12
Yes, we would like to get market prices and results - good point)))
Overall, I see you have experience).
We had an idea(#81), about the average monthly profit, from one of the participants, what do you think, is it all right, maybe something should be added / removed before making this point?
In general, to be honest, it's not right. Strategies work for 1 or 2 months. If we've got a good trader, he would give 50 percent profit easily in a month and stop trading when he understands that things have gone wrong. So everything is going to work out. In my experience, they may make 20 or 40 percent a month, but if they show excess profits, they are casinos.
Actually, to be honest, that's not right either. Strategies work for 1 or 2 months. If the trader is good, they will give 50 percent profit easily in a month and stop trading when they see that things have gone wrong. So everything is going to work out. In my experience it's possible to make 20 or 40 percent a month all the time.
We determine the principles, I understand. Aggressive too useful (casinos), we do not want to sit in them until the plum, if there are points from our filter, for example about communications, etc. - these (dispersants) help us to repay costs on a short term. And spread the risk. After all, we can get out before we see and hear the "peddler") Good word, thank you. We'll take it in our stride.
But I suggest we keep the conversation a little more formal and simple. Translation into English and other languages of special terms and jargon will be difficult and the thread of the conversation will be lost. And it won't be so interesting for newcomers to read... (I added you as a friend, if anything).
The principles are what we define, I understand. Aggressive ones are useful too (casino players), we don't want to sit in them until they are drained, if there are points from our filter, for example about communications and stuff - such (dispensers) will help us recoup costs on the short side. And spread the risk. After all, we can get out before we see and hear the "peddler") Good word, thank you. We'll take it in our stride.
But I suggest we keep the conversation a little more formal and simple. Translation into English and other languages of special terms and jargon will be difficult and the thread of the conversation will be lost. And it won't be so interesting for newcomers to read... (I've added you as a friend, if anything).
I've accepted you as a friend. If i'm not mistaken, i returns around 20% monthly profits and 25% max drawdowns, but the depo entry has no impact whatsoever, if my strategy is good then i'll trade normal amounts in a short time without any pause.
I have accepted you as a friend. There is a golden mean, i.e. a monthly income of about 20 percent, maximum drawdown 25 percent, but depo entry does not affect anything, if a man has a good strategy, he will trade a normal volume in a short time without overdoing it.
Good point. Is the drawdown by equity or by balance? Or maybe more importantly, how much of the drawdown is beaten by the profit)? (49% down and 549% gained and trades all closed)?
Good point, drawdown in equity or balance?
Clearly by equity. On the other hand, if the provider knows (as if it were real) how much the drawdown can be then the drawdown doesn't matter, but only if the profit after the drawdown is many times greater.
Subtle and completely agree. Accepted.