![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Conservatives are stuck on points, there is no logic in alienating pips.
There is nothing stopping them from making the term "pips" in a specific sense - five digits. And it's clear to everyone, and convenient for everyone.
The logic of things already suggests that it is time to use two terms thoroughly.
That's what I'm saying, it's either "p" or "p".
Or point or pips.
That's what I'm saying, it's either "p" or "p".
Or point or pips.
Oh, by the way, "p" and "pp" are handy
That's right. Point 1 has a 'p' in it, and the word 'pips' has two p's in it.
But that's a very simple word, even a child would understand.
Anyway, that's how it works. Pips is the 4th digit, pips is the 5th digit.
You have to use what the whole world uses and not cling to a bunch of near-forexers
point==pip(pip). There is not and cannot be any 5 digits or anything else. All exchanges and dealing accept the 5th digit as is, i.e. 1/10th of a pip/pip
You can even see the opening and current price, earnings ~215.7 pips.
Plain and simple
That's right. Point 1 has a 'p' in it, and the word 'pips' has two p's in it.
But that's a very simple word, even a child would understand.
Anyway, that's how we do it. Pips at the 4th sign, pips at the 5th sign.
What about USDJPY? )
What about the USDJPY for example? )
What is the question? I can't understand it.
What's the question? I can't figure it out.
It's not four or five.)
Ivan Butko:
Ничто не мешает сделать устойчивым термин "пипс" в конкретном смысловом значении - пятизнак. И всем понятно, и всем удобно.
What about the USDJPY for example? )
This way you can see everything, the smallest 1/10th of a pip
It's not 4 or 5.)
So then write that in p. What problem are we?