Strategies that work - page 22
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There are a lot of strategies here.
The whole thing is not a bunch of strategies, but a bunch of rubbish.
All these developers need to do is ask a couple of questions and it will be clear that these strategies only make money in theory, but in practice the picture is very different.
It seems to everyone that if we set Stop Loss at 25 points (for 4 signs) and Take Profit at 50 points, we will have a profit of 25 points.
And they do not say that in practice probability of SL triggering is 2 times higher than TP and it will result in nothing.
They also do not take into account that if we have a fixed TP value, for example 50 points, there are moments when the price reaches 45-48 points, the TP does not trigger and the price goes in the opposite direction and as a result, the SL triggers.
How?
The whole thing is not a bunch of strategies, but a bunch of rubbish.
All these developers need to do is ask a couple of questions and it will be clear that these strategies only make money in theory, but in practice the picture is very different.
It seems to everyone that if we set Stop Loss at 25 points (for 4 signs) and Take Profit at 50 points, we will gain 25 points.
And they do not say that in practice probability of SL triggering is 2 times higher than TP and it will result in nothing.
They also do not take into account that if we have a fixed TP value, for example 50 points, there are moments when the price reaches 45-48 points, TP does not trigger and the price moves in the opposite direction and as a result, SL triggers.
So Take should be dynamic and triggered at the end of the current/beginning of the next trend...
The whole thing is not a bunch of strategies, but a bunch of rubbish.
All these developers need to do is ask a couple of questions and it will be clear that these strategies only make money in theory, but in practice the picture is very different.
It seems to everyone that if we set Stop Loss at 25 points (for 4 signs) and Take Profit at 50 points, we will have profit of 25 points.
And they do not say that in practice probability of SL triggering is 2 times higher than TP and it will result in nothing.
They also do not take into account that if we have a fixed TP, for example 50 points, there are moments when the price reaches 45-48 points, the TP does not trigger, and the price goes in the opposite direction and as a result, the SL triggers.
Have you tried trailing stop?
So Take should be dynamic and triggered at the end of the current/beginning of the next trend...
It's just a matter of finding the end/beginning?
Have you tried a trailing stop?
Tried it, it cuts into profits just like that.
Tried it, it cuts the profits just right.
What did you expect? The closing of position has to be 100% justified, and trailing stop mechanism is just an artificial bug for beginners...
Not everyone is a Demo Master like you. No matter how silly the idea is, we test it anyway. But, you are wrong again, trailing helps a little on HFT, but on regular brokers/dts this method is impossible.
Not everyone is a Demo Master like you. No matter how silly the idea is, we test it anyway. But, you are wrong again, trailing helps a little on HFT, but on regular brokers/dts this method is not possible.
Don't be fooled! HFT is a separate song... you could say it's like a dream: "to become an astronaut"... and not available to mere mortals...
You are, quote, "mushy in the head". When you write your answer, you already forget what you were answering. You need to get it together.