Creating a trading robot - page 31
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Good thinking, Anatoly. It is a very good indicator, no fooling around - but for flat market conditions. On strong news, in a trend - it breaks. And there the entire topic from page 135 until the finale was dedicated to finding the trend/flat key. That key is the kurtosis of the distribution of increments. But, I'm not claiming to be the final truth here. Perhaps someone will apply the Hurst coefficient or autocorrelation and get better results. But it is the sum of increments in a sliding window and the correct variance calculation that is basic in TS.
Well you don't want to enter into the tail side when there is no visible movement and exit in the excess. You were exploiting the entry in the kurtosis, in the subsequent time if it coincided with the direction of the tail with no visible movement, and exit at the next kurtosis.
Well you don't want to enter towards the tail when there is no visible movement and exit at the excess. You were exploiting the entrance in the excess, in subsequent time if it coincided with the direction of the tail with no visible movement, and exiting at the next excess.
Mate! Since you are obviously podotr's nephew or son, I'd love to just give you the indicator I keep talking about. Or the lumberjack "rails". I think these are the best indicators out there.
But, you see, what a problem - Pako zakodil "rails" and fled from the forum (really do not know where he got it Lumberjack), and an indicator of Warlock simply no one is able to make up, suffering from obtuseness. Here we go :))
All open-source projects on the market are doomed. Even if it is good and right, once there are many users, it will kill itself. And that will happen very soon.
Money likes silence). That's the platitude.
You may be right. Let's hang out in this thread).
All open-source projects on the market are doomed. Even if it is good and right, once there are many users, it will kill itself. And that will happen very soon.
Money likes silence). Such is the platitude.
Penguins disagree with you.
As a continuation of the thread started, the results of a few variations of the current gbpusd trend for 16.1.2019 using the regular Zigzag. This, though a large, but BEFORE ALL the available returns of the day.
All open-source projects on the market are doomed. Even if it is good and right, once there are many users, it will kill itself. And that will happen very soon.
Money likes silence). Such is the platitude.
As a continuation of the thread started, the results of a few variations of the current gbpusd trend for 16.1.2019 using the regular Zigzag. This, although a big one, is BEFORE ALL the available returns of the day.
To test the cable, the spread needs to be set at 40 or more. Only then will we get closer to real trading results.
To test the cable, the spread should be set at 40 or more. Only then will we get closer to real trading results.
Actually, one should not test one, but all currency pairs of the main basket, without making up anything,
and choose the most profitable one for intraday trading (or profitable ones, if working deposit allows).
As a continuation of the thread started, the results of a few variations of the current gbpusd trend for 16.1.2019 using the regular Zigzag. This, although a big one, is not ALL of the available returns of the day.
A nice long sideways sideways trend is taken. And how many days like this? Closest similar conditions but shorter in time: Jan 8, 27 , 17, 10, Dec 8.
Took a nice long sideways sideways spell. And how many of those days? Closest similar conditions but shorter in time: January 8, 27,17, 10, 8 December.
Could be. But testing on one hand was accidental (due to Brexit), but on the other hand it confirmed that the development of the Expert Advisor is going in the right direction and with quite good results. Although very slowly.