The programmer gave me an order and then put it up for sale - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So tell me the name of the programmer, since you have ordered from him, you know. People will know then.
Why? After all, everything has been settled.
Then what's all the fuss about?
Then why make such a fuss?
Actually you are directly suggesting that you are violating the forum's reputation rules.
But I would (not as a moderator - as a human being) ask you - do you always bring rubbish in public?
Such issues are always resolved in private discussion with the administration.
Actually you are directly suggesting that you are violating the forum's reputation rules.
But I would (not as a moderator - as a human being) ask you - do you always bring rubbish in public?
Such matters are always settled in private discussion with the administration.
The programmer has written back and asked permission to sell this product, my opinion is to let people use it. But the tactic is not over, and if the programmer wants to finish, THIS will help people.
And the thread has rapidly descended into hype advertising...
already someone has even asked to "take a look" :-)
And the thread has rapidly descended into hype advertising...
already someone has even asked for a "look" :-)
+1
No orders in the profile!Your consent is not necessary. Copyright does not work in Russia.
Where do you see copyright in the customer? Copyright is a non-property personal inalienable right. The copyright to The Quiet Don and The Uplifted Virgin Lands still belongs to the late Sholokhov. Not the publishing house, under contract with which he may have worked.
The copyright to the programme belongs to the creator and cannot pass to anyone else.
In order to avoid this kind of debriefing, the rights of the client and the contractor should be made joint. And the problem will fall away on its own.
Any good idea can be drowned by poor execution.
In order to avoid this kind of debriefing, it is necessary to make the rights of the client and the contractor joint. And the problem will go away on its own.
...
This is difficult. How do you stratify the property rights between them: right of use, possession and disposal? How much space would it take to lay out the resulting provisions? Who would read it? I don't have any convincing answer to any of these questions. To recommend to formalise these questions in a special contract or licence agreement is also a burden for the participants of the customer-executor relations. This work can cost more than the order itself.