![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Only one question remains...
Only one question remains...
It's coming because firms that don't introduce the SCA will be fined by the FCA regulator or so they will be frozen out until they do. So that innovation gives a chance that ePayments firm wants to be afloat for now
Do you think there is any chance that this update is the final stage in meeting the FCA's requirements?
About the final one, I won't say. There was just a theory that knowing about the ePayments requirement they deliberately went with the FCA agreement into the block. As they didn't have time to implement the features. Who knows. Just what does this have to do with laundering, although no, it said so -
This decision was taken following a review, by the FCA, of ePayments anti-money laundering systems and controls, which identified weakness that required remediation.
So it's clearly not known whether or not the money was laundered, it turns out. But the systems and controls were weak
... I'm ready to wait.
Vladon, when you get to the point of "that's it, NOT ready to wait any longer" -- what will you do?
Vladon, when you get to the point of "that's it, NOT ready to wait any longer" -- what will you do?
I assume that waiting is next) as... There are no more options... only with less hope
Here's a classic of the genre for occasions like this
Here's a classic of the genre for occasions like this
And let's get Vladimir Baskakov, he has been actively campaigning for "everything under the FSA, regulate us completely", he probably knows the way out. It's probably a no-brainer, it's a serious office in civilised Britain.
Vladimir Baskakov, come out!