A man has become a billionaire. What is his purpose in life now? - page 26
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The rich won't voluntarily give part of their profits to the poor, so a progressive tax scale, up to 60 per cent of profits, has been invented
So they will move to other countries where poverty doesn't rip them off.
The rich won't voluntarily give part of their profits to the poor, so a progressive tax scale, up to 60 per cent of profits, has been devised
Imagine a person has a million. he invests it in a business and gets 5 percent a year. then the government makes a law that he has to pay 60 percent of the profit.
Imagine that he invests a million and then the government makes a law that he has to pay 60% of the profit and then he gets just 2%.
So they will move to other countries where poverty does not rip them off.
Imagine a man has a million. he invests it in a business and gets 5% per annum. then the government comes up with a law that he has to pay 60% of the profit.
and then he can only get 2% per annum. so why the fuck would he do such a business! he won't create anything at all.
2% does not mean anything, maybe his salary is exorbitant and other personal expenses are included...
Which official? The taxpayers.
There is no public money, only taxpayers' money.
It is the officials who manage the money, not the taxpayers, and whoever manages it actually owns it...
Taxpayers is a misnomer, money belongs to all citizens equally, not by the amount of taxes paid.
what official? the taxpayers.
there is no public money, only taxpayers' money.
Don't argue with those Ivan's on the cooker)) "at will".
What would you choose: an increase in wages by 10% today and for the economy to always remain as it is now,
or to give up the wage increase now, but for the economy to boom.
that is: a tax system where everyone pays 20% or a tax system where the poor pay 10% and the rich 60%.
It is a proven fact that the lower the tax on the entrepreneur, the faster the economy grows.
So if you refuse a 10% wage increase now, you will receive it in 5 years when the economy grows and in 5 years you will receive a 10% wage increase.
in other words: If you refuse a 10% wage increase, you will invest 10% more each month.
What would you choose: a 10% wage increase today and for the economy to always remain as it is now,
"To him about Thomas and to him about Yeremma" :))
Is it difficult to understand the simple idea that everything in a state corporation belongs to the shareholders, who in this case are all citizens.
After that, all questions about taxes and salaries automatically fall away as irrelevant... It seems obvious...
Don't argue with those Ivan's on the cooker.
"To him about Thomas and to him about Yeremma" :))
Is it difficult to understand the simple idea that everything in a state corporation belongs to the shareholders, who in this case are all citizens.
After that, all questions about taxes and salaries automatically fall away as irrelevant... It seems obvious...
there are no state-owned enterprises in america. there are 1-2, maximum 10 state-owned enterprises in western countries.
what state corporations? state corporations exist only in degenerate states. state ownership of enterprises is communism.
there are no state-owned enterprises in america. in western countries there are 1-2, maximum 10 state-owned enterprises.
Once again, Russia is a global corporation just like other countries, they are registered as such and therefore subject to the laws of corporations...
google it.
You are off topic again, RF is a global corporation like other countries, they are registered as such and therefore subject to the laws of corporations...
Google is your guide.
don't take it all so directly.