A pattern. - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There are three patterns - price goes up, price goes down, price doesn't go anywhere at all.
There are three patterns - the price goes up, the price goes down and the price goes nowhere at all. This is quite enough for trading. What was there before is of no interest. And there is no need to draw anything on history.)
I do not look at the lines, they are more precise for the program for other purposes. The programme has one main parameter and two additional ones, it calculates, draws and gives the ready result. For example, three columns at the bottom right - it shows the probable direction in percent. There are a lot of other interesting things there practically on one parameter. It works with any timeframe and any symbol even with RND. 2500 is too much, but if so much is required, then everyone is the boss for himself.
Yes, it evokes far more emotion than Malevich's Black Square.
It's still in the process of debugging the software. I can remove all the artwork, but it won't change anything. Sometimes it's nice to have a quick look at what the program is doing.)
Not for the sake of beauty, but for it to work well)))
Works on any TF and any instrument, even on RND. 2500 is too much, but if so much is required, then everyone is his own boss.
I am weak - 1 TF and 1 instrument, but, like, no more is required.
What is 2500?
I don't have much - 1 TF and 1 tool, but I don't seem to need any more.
What's 2500?
Somebody has that many settings.
"And there's no need to draw anything on history.")
To know the future you need to know history. That's my principle.
Someone has so many settings.
" And there's no need to draw anything on history at all.)"
You have to know history to know the future. That's the principle.
I don't. I only have about 1000 - these are the coefficients of the neural network.
At one time I got tired of writing logic - the last systems had about 100 parameters and a lot of time to configure this stuff. Replaced logic with NS, and here we have 1000 parameters). But it adjusts itself during training. Also not fast, but there is no need to think about every parameter, and it's still faster.
Not me. I only have about 1000 - these are neural network coefficients.
At one time I got tired of writing logic - the last systems had about 100 parameters and a lot of time to configure this stuff. Replaced logic with NS, and here we have 1000 parameters). But it adjusts itself during training. Also takes a long time, but there's no need to think over every parameter, and it's still faster.
It seems to me that NS with learning on markets is a dead end. But everyone has their own way to the Grail.
One parameter and price, you don't need anything else. The price already has everything built into it for the future.
Yusuf-Khoja understood this, but he has disappeared. Is he alive? Age, after all. Or has he found a formula?
It seems to me that NS with learning from markets is a dead end.
A dead end in what way? Let's say my version of NS is just learning logic. Tell me how it differs from the usual one?
My answer is absolutely nothing.
ZS
YusufKhoja understood this, but he is nowhere to be found.
YusufKhoja, what I have seen from him is not serious at all.
There are big players and there are small players on whom the price has little influence. Smaller players usually go against the trend. And when the big players eat their stops, the price will turn in the opposite direction. Figuratively speaking.
What kind of players are you?
Judging by your reasoning, none. Make up your mind and take a side. Maybe then you'll have a strategy or you'll forget about forex.
p.s. there are no regularities in the market!How is it a dead end? Let's say my version of NS is just learning logic. Tell me, how is it different from ordinary logic?
My answer is absolutely nothing.
What criteria should be used to determine when to retrain it? A new training area may be fundamentally unsuited to the new realities.
I'm not in any way discouraging it. It's just a thought. Been there.